Machines are a product of human thinking. When man wanted to cut down mundane tasks and do things faster, he invented computer; when he wanted to reach his destinations faster, he invented the wheel. All the machines which humans have invented have improved with time because humans have an inexhaustible pool of past knowledge which machines don’t. The ability of humans to always strive for better makes him superior to machines.
Humans invent machines to expand their footprint in the universe. Early humans – driven by their basic needs – made tools for hunting animals, invented fire for cooking food and built shelter for their protection. When the basic needs got satisfied, they went a step ahead and invented electricity. This chain continues till date and the driver for all the magnificent inventions which we see around us is the insatiable curiosity of the human mind. We can build cars for making transportation faster but there will always be the next generation who will improvise upon the already existing knowledge and build airplanes!
It’s the very human activities which make us feel the converse to be true that machines are no less than human mind. The Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombing in Japan by the United States served as an example of machines showing dominance over the human race. We should, however, note that we invented bombs for our safety not for mass destruction. Machines will only be as powerful as we let them to be. The old adage fits perfectly here that “Science is a good servant but a bad master.”
Machines are only our allies to explore the unexplored, to uncover the mysteries of the universe and above all to serve the humanity. The concept of superiority comes only when someone wants to show power. If we abandon this concept, then we won’t see machines as our servant but more as our allies in our mission.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 291, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...;t see machines as our servant but more as our allies in our mission.
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'then']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.242339832869 0.240241500013 101% => OK
Verbs: 0.175487465181 0.157235817809 112% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0724233983287 0.0880659088768 82% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0473537604457 0.0497285424764 95% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0696378830084 0.0444667217837 157% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.0974930362117 0.12292977631 79% => OK
Participles: 0.0278551532033 0.0406280797675 69% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.63843119095 2.79330140395 94% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0306406685237 0.030933414821 99% => OK
Particles: 0.00278551532033 0.0016655270985 167% => OK
Determiners: 0.0891364902507 0.0997080785238 89% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0139275766017 0.0249443105267 56% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.025069637883 0.0148568991511 169% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1892.0 2732.02544248 69% => OK
No of words: 317.0 452.878318584 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.96845425868 6.0361032391 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.58838876751 92% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.343848580442 0.366273622748 94% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.258675078864 0.280924506359 92% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.192429022082 0.200843997647 96% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.110410094637 0.132149295362 84% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63843119095 2.79330140395 94% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 219.290929204 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580441640379 0.48968727796 119% => OK
Word variations: 63.8049308991 55.4138127331 115% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6194690265 73% => OK
Sentence length: 21.1333333333 23.380412469 90% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5942126722 59.4972553346 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.133333333 141.124799967 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1333333333 23.380412469 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.333333333333 0.674092028746 49% => More Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 47.0008412198 51.4728631049 91% => OK
Elegance: 1.25714285714 1.64882698954 76% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.468946884035 0.391690518653 120% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.100174585331 0.123202303941 81% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0624694548492 0.077325440228 81% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.486988154776 0.547984918172 89% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.127077751659 0.149214159877 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.181047087931 0.161403998019 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0997315649165 0.0892212321368 112% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.337858004989 0.385218514788 88% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0419071534694 0.0692045440612 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.31874192337 0.275328986314 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0265766307342 0.0653680567796 41% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.4325221239 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30420353982 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 7.22455752212 97% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 13.5995575221 81% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.