Some families cannot afford to educate their children because of poverty and ironically education is the panacea for elimination of poverty. Governments already have scholarship schemes for meritorious students belonging to economically weaker backgrounds which give them fee waivers to help them complete their education. Extending these policies to a 100% waiver might have some social and economic consequences though.
Having free education for the poor will encourage more students to pursue education. Many economically weak families forgo the idea of education for their children because of the financial burden it brings along and the cycle of poverty continues in the family due to lack of education. Such scheme will help break such cycles and help improve the literacy rates of states. One positive social consequence of this would be educated people from the poor communities will inspire other people to pursue education as well.
Social customs like honour killing and dowry are very prevalent among poor communities in India. Education among poor communities will help eliminate these social customs which in turn cripple them from progressing forward.
Providing free education to the poor might accompany some undesirable consequences as well. Parents who work hard for the education of their children might become reluctant to hard work after knowing that they won’t have to pay for their children’s education. Students coming from poor backgrounds might take education for granted because of the upliftment of economic burden from their shoulders. Such schemes will also make governments allocate greater funds in the education sector which will impact the overall budget allocation of the country – the consequences of which will eventually come down to the individual taxpayer.
In conclusion, free education will definitely help for the betterment of poor communities but we must be aware of the social and economic consequences that come along with such schemes as well.
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'so', 'well', 'in conclusion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.25 0.240241500013 104% => OK
Verbs: 0.151234567901 0.157235817809 96% => OK
Adjectives: 0.12037037037 0.0880659088768 137% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0586419753086 0.0497285424764 118% => OK
Pronouns: 0.037037037037 0.0444667217837 83% => OK
Prepositions: 0.12962962963 0.12292977631 105% => OK
Participles: 0.0308641975309 0.0406280797675 76% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.76126604682 2.79330140395 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.033950617284 0.030933414821 110% => OK
Particles: 0.00308641975309 0.0016655270985 185% => OK
Determiners: 0.0771604938272 0.0997080785238 77% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0462962962963 0.0249443105267 186% => Less modal verbs wanted (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.0185185185185 0.0148568991511 125% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2001.0 2732.02544248 73% => OK
No of words: 307.0 452.878318584 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.51791530945 6.0361032391 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.58838876751 91% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.416938110749 0.366273622748 114% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.328990228013 0.280924506359 117% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.241042345277 0.200843997647 120% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.179153094463 0.132149295362 136% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76126604682 2.79330140395 99% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 219.290929204 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.504885993485 0.48968727796 103% => OK
Word variations: 50.7986574891 55.4138127331 92% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6194690265 68% => OK
Sentence length: 21.9285714286 23.380412469 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5823825856 59.4972553346 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.928571429 141.124799967 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9285714286 23.380412469 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.428571428571 0.674092028746 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.21349557522 0% => OK
Readability: 54.8275942299 51.4728631049 107% => OK
Elegance: 1.6625 1.64882698954 101% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278825871514 0.391690518653 71% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.118230759358 0.123202303941 96% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0747806341088 0.077325440228 97% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.620325674751 0.547984918172 113% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.144965128697 0.149214159877 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124984428082 0.161403998019 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594006490686 0.0892212321368 67% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.241351928618 0.385218514788 63% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.121117783678 0.0692045440612 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17584637106 0.275328986314 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.072458955573 0.0653680567796 111% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.4325221239 58% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.30420353982 132% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88274336283 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 5.0 7.22455752212 69% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 3.66592920354 164% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 13.5995575221 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.