Claim: It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.
Reason: The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
Some people contend that in the contemporary society, everyone's repute is facing to be diminished, owing to the wide-ranging social media. Under such exposure, people's downside would be disseminated to the public, which leads to a fact that none can be a hero. However, I hold the opposite view that hero does exist in the world.
To begin with, I express my appreciation to the reason part. It's true that many famous people with worldwide fame have been negatively affected by media. With the development of the Internet and technology, the news can be spread around the world within a second. Whether it is right or wrong, the news capable of invoking a sensation could be focused too much by the public. Therefore, the disadvantages of a celebrity will be magnified and exaggerated. To be more specific, Bill Clinton was the president of America, who encouraged the advancement of information technology and improved national economy. Unfortunately, when his marital disloyalty get exposure to the public, people removed their attention from his feats, focusing too much on the scandal and overlooking his contribution to America. In such case, the media definitely harms one's reputation.
Nevertheless, not each extraordinary person has sensational scandals worthy to be exploited exhaustively by the media. Sometimes, the stories and behaviors of those people are always positive. Under this circumstance, media can even serve as a tool that publicizes the achievements of such people, creating a status of moral model. When it comes to Bill Gates, people will consider him as one of most successful businessmen in the world. Yet, except for being an elite of IT industry, he is also the founder of Bill & Melinda Gates foundation that has been helping the poor people who are suffering contagious diseases in Africa. According to the report of media, from 1994-2020, he has donated over 35 billion dollars to the needy people. Because of the exposure, his behaviors were respected and followed by more and more people in these years.
Finally, in my opinion, the society and citizens are still expecting the advent of the heroes. In some country, the crime rate remains constant, which results from the scarcity of belief and government relevant education. The status of hero is helpful to identify the behavioral standard and excellent belief that encourage everyone to follow. By this way, the government get a chance to present the positive atmosphere of society. Under this circumstance, it's not surprising that government would like to find someone and to regards him/her as a hero. For example, Youyou Tu is the owner of Nobel Prize in the field of physiology in 2015, who devoted much vigor and effort into a series of researches on artemisinin to treat malaria. Her contribution helped millions of people's life in Africa. For her prodigious contribution and arduous attitude toward her work, the media disseminated her story and whole society considered her as the hero. From then on, she has been the standard of every practitioner.
In a nutshell, as the opinion stated above, both reason and claim of the issue are not totally true.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 845, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...n such case, the media definitely harms ones reputation. Nevertheless, not each e...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, look, nevertheless, second, so, still, then, therefore, except for, for example, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 81.0 58.6224719101 138% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2647.0 2235.4752809 118% => OK
No of words: 516.0 442.535393258 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12984496124 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76609204519 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89274932946 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 290.0 215.323595506 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562015503876 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 847.8 704.065955056 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 4.38483146067 388% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.6802470853 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5357142857 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4285714286 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.07142857143 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143418988445 0.243740707755 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.034210008256 0.0831039109588 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0263813422987 0.0758088955206 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0806702349878 0.150359130593 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0244521436169 0.0667264976115 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 159.0 100.480337079 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.