People who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are also the most critical of it.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Some people contend that someone, especially the scientists might be critical of something they created, as they are clear about the disadvantages of their brainchild. Although they have devoted much into researches, they feel regretful of what they have done. However, I hold the opposite view that, in the most of time, people must be proud of their achievement.
It is true that some researchers' creativity would lead to calamity for world and part of humans. The original intention of some scientists is unearthing the truism and nature of some mysterious phenomenon or bringing advancement for humans. While, their achievements are likely to be misused by others, leading to side effects. After that, the feeling of apology and regret would be derived from themselves. To be more specific, Einstein was one of the most talent and famous scientists throughout human history, promoting the advancement of physiology into a large degree. He devoted much effort into the research of relativity theory that's theoretic premise of nuclear weapon. In other word, he contributed to the production of such horrible weapon taking many people's live. When he were aware of the disadvantage brought by his theory, he put forward the criticism toward what he had done. In such case, Einstein dedicated in his researches while being critical of it.
However, the majority of people would not present objurgation on what they deeply committed. There is no doubt that people would deliberately determine to immerse themselves into something, thus, after such consideration, their choices would be promising and positive, without disadvantages generally. For an example, Youyou Tu won the Nobel Price in field of physiology in 2015. She started researches on artemisinin from 1960s to treat malaria, with saving thousands of people's live. Her contributions to the world were regarded as the greatest invention. Everyone in the world praises for her tremendous breakthrough on treatment. Also, Bill Gates, the most successful businessman, were passive in benevolence, creating his own charity and constantly donating over 35 billion dollar from 1996 to 2020. Therefore, these famous people's commitments are always meaningful to the society, without any criticism for their behaviors.
More importantly, even though people find out some troubles their pursuit would bring, they would still keep going. Once people set a goal and determine what they are going to do, it is nearly impossible to change their ideas, especially relating to their profits. In fact, only small part of people would concede their malfeasance or wrong like Einstein. Specifically, nowadays, the environment around us is getting bad, especially water resources, due to pollutions discharged by many factories. In fact, these factories skip the necessary processes of industrial pollution and directly discharge them into river, in order to increase the interests. Despite being harmful to the nature, the leader of such factory would not stop a series of misfeasance, let alone being critical of themselves. We can figure out such cases in other fields, like discharge of noxious gases, deforestation and so on, all of which is to maximize the interests.
In a nutshell, I maintain that most people would not being critical of their achievements.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 22, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'researchers'' or 'researcher's'?
Suggestion: researchers'; researcher's
...ir achievement. It is true that some researchers creativity would lead to calamity for w...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 637, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
... into the research of relativity theory thats theoretic premise of nuclear weapon. In...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 243, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...such consideration, their choices would be promising and positive, without disadvantages gen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 337, Rule ID: PRICE_PRIZE[3]
Message: Did you mean 'Nobel Prize' (reward)?
Suggestion: Nobel Prize
...ally. For an example, Youyou Tu won the Nobel Price in field of physiology in 2015. She sta...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 381, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding environment'?
Suggestion: the surrounding environment
... like Einstein. Specifically, nowadays, the environment around us is getting bad, especially water resour...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 944, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of which is to maximize the interests. In a nutshell, I maintain that most peop...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, therefore, thus, while, in fact, no doubt, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 88.0 58.6224719101 150% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2799.0 2235.4752809 125% => OK
No of words: 520.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38269230769 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77530192783 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91085438056 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 296.0 215.323595506 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569230769231 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 849.6 704.065955056 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 6.24550561798 256% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 4.38483146067 342% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.0717013373 60.3974514979 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.9642857143 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5714285714 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.14285714286 5.21951772744 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105136862414 0.243740707755 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0306589072316 0.0831039109588 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0288185282477 0.0758088955206 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0739316126523 0.150359130593 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035031448713 0.0667264976115 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 151.0 100.480337079 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.