To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.
Some people contend that public leaders have to remain highly moral to keep every part functioning smoothly. However, I hold the opposite view that morality is not a criterion of an outstanding leader.
Admittedly, someone objects my point of view and they think a leader should maintain commensurate images to the public. This is because their ethical and moral behaviors are capable of affecting the citizens, thus people would also control their own actions. As a result, there are not too many misfeasance that transgress social orders. Specifically, in ancient China, Dynasty Tong was dominated by the emperors with high ethic. Under this circumstance, Tong reached the peak of prosperity in the fields of economy and culture throughout Chinese history. In great contrast, Dynasty Yuan's rulers were famous for their ferocious behaviors, advocating conquering other civilizations with battles. Yuan only persisted for about 60 years, after that it devolved and was replaced by others.
In great contrast, blindly keeping highest ethical standards can be regarded as an obvious weakness for a leader, because in order to remain highest moral, one would be limited by many determinants that are negative to leader's decisions. Similarly, people's interest would get harm by the consistence of the marble image of leader. Image a country with a highest ethical president. When a contagious disease spread over citizens so rapid that country would not be able to control it. Under this circumstance, as an effective leader, what he does is conciliating people rather than telling them the truth that might discourage them. However, veiling such essential information is an immoral behavior. Therefore, if a leader with highest moral is obdurate to make such terrible situation public, despite he or she remain moral, whole country would encounter with turbulence and anxiety for a long time. Clearly, keeping moral in some special situation is not a wise choice.
More importantly, in most time, even if the leader does not keep ethical in traditional perspective, they still are able to be an outstanding one. In fact, to be an effective leader, it is enough to rule the citizens in an equitable way, promoting life standards that is presented through the increment of economy and productivity. Under this circumstance, the necessary capacity of leading whole country is oratory skills and political talent, which can be regarded as the standard of the effective leaders. For instance, Bill Clinton, the president of America in last century, was criticized for his marital indiscretion and was thought of as adverse image to the public. However, in that period, he facilitated American economy to boost obviously, which made the majority satisfied. As a result, with the support from public, he successfully reined for next 5 years. Clearly, although Clinton was accused of his unethical behavior, he was also a significant leader of whole country.
In a nutshell, I maintain that, as a leader, he or she should see government operations and people’s will as prerequisite and priority, instead of simply keeping moral, which will not have any positive influence on country and citizens he or she serves.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 291, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun misfeasance seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much misfeasance', 'a good deal of misfeasance'.
Suggestion: much misfeasance; a good deal of misfeasance
...actions. As a result, there are not too many misfeasance that transgress social orders. Specific...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 28, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'keeping the highest'.
Suggestion: keeping the highest
... others. In great contrast, blindly keeping highest ethical standards can be regarded as an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 135, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'remain the highest'.
Suggestion: remain the highest
...kness for a leader, because in order to remain highest moral, one would be limited by many det...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 353, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...e image of leader. Image a country with a highest ethical president. When a conta...
^
Line 5, column 382, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...untry with a highest ethical president. When a contagious disease spread over citize...
^^^^
Line 5, column 723, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the highest'.
Suggestion: with the highest
...mmoral behavior. Therefore, if a leader with highest moral is obdurate to make such terrible...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 812, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'remains'.
Suggestion: remains
...ble situation public, despite he or she remain moral, whole country would encounter wi...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 218, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an equitable way" with adverb for "equitable"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ader, it is enough to rule the citizens in an equitable way, promoting life standards that is prese...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, similarly, so, still, therefore, thus, for instance, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2707.0 2235.4752809 121% => OK
No of words: 512.0 442.535393258 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.287109375 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75682846001 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86223321863 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 275.0 215.323595506 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537109375 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 850.5 704.065955056 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.10617977528 322% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 4.38483146067 342% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2737593707 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.28 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.48 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.68 5.21951772744 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351220380386 0.243740707755 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0874615825372 0.0831039109588 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0801405188914 0.0758088955206 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186911433383 0.150359130593 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0917105444838 0.0667264976115 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 149.0 100.480337079 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.