In most professions and academic fields, imagination is more important than knowledge.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Some people underscore excessively the importance of knowledge, even they are overlooking what role the imagination is playing. I hold the opposite view that it depends. The answer of this problem is not absolute. There are diverse conclusions to this question in different situation.
Admittedly, some people present extreme opposition to my point of view. From their perspective, with the rapid development of society, as an individual, the competitiveness is boosting. People hardly achieve success without receive education. To be more specific, nowadays, thousands of students graduated are rushing into job market and such situation would be more severe in next decade. Consequently, it is by owning outstanding knowledge storage and extensive knowledge structure that one would get a chance to leave the profound impression for corporations. For those famous companies, they are inclined to the talents with knowledge who are able to complete assignment more efficiently than others. In such case, it is not surprising that knowledge is the foundation of successful one.
In great contrast, in the field of art, it is not doubt profound imagination and creativity is indispensable for artists. There would not be numerous classic works appreciated by people without their unrestrained imagination. This is to say, creativity serves as a carrier that is able to transmit authors' colorful ideas in terms of art. In Sunrise Impression, Monet, one of the greatest impressionists in seventeenth century, successfully created the scenery of sunrise, which broke the traditional perspective of artists so as to be lionized by descendant generations. This masterpiece can be regarded as the combination of both imagination and visual sight. In such case, Monet's whimsical imagination have incredibly influenced the inspiration of later generations.
More importantly, the effect of imagination is equal to the acquisition of knowledge. To be honest, not many remarkable achievements is solely depended on creativity or knowledge. With the rapid development of modern society, it is significant to combine both of them to reach success. To be more specific, Einstein, the laureate of Nobel Prize in physics, worked out Relativity Theory. Such theory is regarded by the next generation as the foundation upon which modern physics is able to develop rapidly. Although he was a impeccable talent with extensive knowledge structure in physics, he was still imaginative enough to come up with novel and emergent ideas, which was another factor making him highly successful. There are numerous instances of this kind of thing, like the invent of bulb, airplane and the foundation of Apple, etc. All of such accomplishment require combination of imagination and academic performance.
In a nutshell, I still remain that this problem cannot be determined easily.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 524, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... the traditional perspective of artists so as to be lionized by descendant generations. ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 523, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ble to develop rapidly. Although he was a impeccable talent with extensive knowle...
^
Line 7, column 776, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...s instances of this kind of thing, like the invent of bulb, airplane and the foundation of...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, look, so, still, as to, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 19.5258426966 164% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 12.9106741573 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2428.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 439.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53075170843 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21290956367 2.79657885939 115% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553530751708 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 773.1 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.38483146067 296% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.1955210722 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3846153846 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8846153846 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.88461538462 5.21951772744 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171900575249 0.243740707755 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0396113466263 0.0831039109588 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0293443833244 0.0758088955206 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0813917711633 0.150359130593 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460687666885 0.0667264976115 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 48.8420337079 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.1639044944 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.38706741573 115% => OK
difficult_words: 145.0 100.480337079 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.