Some people believe that government officials must carry out the will of the people they serve Others believe that officials should base their decisions on their own judgment Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your o

Essay topics:

Some people believe that government officials must carry out the will of the people they serve. Others believe that officials should base their decisions on their own judgment.

Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.

Some people contend that the government should be treated as authoritative, thus national decisions must be decided based on their own judgement without considering citizens. However, I hold the opposite view that people are the foundation of a country. The government have to take people's will into consideration.

Admittedly, it is true that some decisions need to be determined solely by government. This is because everyone has their own ideas to the country, so it is impossible to attain a state of consilience that makes everyone satisfied. To be more specific, every country has its own law formulating for its condition. Thinking about it, if government consult people's will before making a decision for rules, how turbulent a society would be? In order for their own profit, everyone would have different thoughts belonging to themselves. Therefore, whenever relating to the formulation of making laws, government should be regarded as the only determinant. The public does not have any rights to meddle it.

However, in the most of time, before making the final decisions, the priority and primacy issues government consider are people's will. After all, citizens are arguably the foundation for government existence. In my opinion, without citizens, institution of government is somewhat meaningless. Therefore, it is necessary for the government to make a considerable decision meeting the requirement of the majority. Roosevelt's New Deal was published at last century in America for assuaging the impression of the Great Depression. Numerous contents in it bridled the capitalism, which caused discontent from capitalists who imposed oppressive pressure on the government. However, for increasing the employment rate and promoting people's live standard, Roosevelt confirmedly put New Deal into practice. In this case, government indeed take citizens' will into consideration.

More importantly, sometimes government are not willing to consider the will of people, as they only fixate their own interests. Under this circumstance, it would be a fact that the majority of people would come to be a solidarity having forces to fight against the government, because every person does not want to be treated unfairly. Specifically, the origin of collapses of Qing Dynasty is that the governor squandered money on the palaces' construction, forcing people to work for emperor with little profit. Careless about the wills from citizens, the feelings of discontent were spread among people in that period. In the end, numerous people started revolution, leading to the dead of Qing Dynasty. Therefore, leaving people's wills aside extremely would cause a calamity for the government.

In a nutshell, no matter considering the responsibility of government or the result of overlooking citizens, the government should take the wills from people into consideration.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-11-24 ekarumeblessing@icloud.com 54 view
2024-11-12 ekarumeblessing@icloud.com 58 view
2022-11-23 zanzendegi 62 view
2022-09-17 rockchisom 79 view
2022-04-06 Sumit68 83 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user 张博文 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 436, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'palaces'' or 'palace's'?
Suggestion: palaces'; palace's
...at the governor squandered money on the palaces construction, forcing people to work fo...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, therefore, thus, after all, as to, in my opinion, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 14.8657303371 20% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 32.0 12.9106741573 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2439.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 440.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54318181818 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0947160713 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534090909091 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 769.5 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.5778523925 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.56 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.32 5.21951772744 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241091487431 0.243740707755 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0708608172759 0.0831039109588 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514652995543 0.0758088955206 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158511851736 0.150359130593 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0550998479079 0.0667264976115 83% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.1639044944 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 100.480337079 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.