Claim: It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.
Reason: The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
Throughout the history, there are many heroes. From Akhilkeus to the Spiderman, many people love and fascinate the heroes because they show sacrifice and exploit. Someone claim that we no longer regard any living man or woman as a hero because media subject their life to scrutiny. I strongly disagree with the statement; there are many examples of living heroes, which makes the claim unpersuasive.
The proponents illustrate the claim by many examples of who was once considered as hero but, under thorough scrutiny of media, turned out as a villain. ‘Molar daddy’ is one of the strongest instance. A documentary on his life told it as a saddened story of a sole dad with a daughter, but recent scrutiny of other media makes overt the dark side of him. He raped his wife, let her suicide and, using his daughter, he raped and killed a friend of his daughter. The ‘Molar daddy’ seems to show that it is no longer possible for us to regard any living man or woman as a hero.
Although ‘Molar daddy’ is despicable for his wrongdoings, fundamentally media is the source of these cases. This is because media want to show them publicly. To be successful, media often manipulate what they saw and heard, or they are disguised by the villains so that the evils are described as hero. ‘Molar daddy’ case exactly indicate this point. Making the documentary, the staffs cannot help but depict him as a charitable daddy under pressure on them. Thus, what makes once-heroes turned out to be villains is media. However, media do so not by critical attitude but by condoning the evils.
Also, there are many people keep doing righteous actions in spite of scrutiny of media. Most of them are not extraordinary person, but pedestrian as we are except that they volunteer to do heroic deed. I know a public official who is as common as other officials, but once saved a person’s life by calling 911 and giving him first aid. Though some people might complain that what he did is too small to be considered as hero, but most people consider him as a hero and as common people he did not and will not wrongdoings.
In conclusion, although some of the once-heroes are now turned out to be non-hero by media, there are righteous people keeping doing their deed in spite of spotlight. Therefore, the statement is too general to hold true.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 172, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'Someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'claims'.
Suggestion: claims
...hey show sacrifice and exploit. Someone claim that we no longer regard any living man...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 25, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...rongdoings. In conclusion, although some of the once-heroes are now turned out to be no...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, therefore, thus, in conclusion, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1971.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 408.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83088235294 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75843116174 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497549019608 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 624.6 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.989073921 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.5909090909 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5454545455 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.54545454545 5.21951772744 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199818814754 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589726867059 0.0831039109588 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0754849465994 0.0758088955206 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115340840761 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571867318068 0.0667264976115 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 14.1392134831 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.