Claim Major policy decisions should always be left to politicians and other government experts Reason Politicians and other government experts are more informed and thus have better judgment and perspective than do members of the general public Write a re

Essay topics:

Claim: Major policy decisions should always be left to politicians and other government experts.
Reason: Politicians and other government experts are more informed and thus have better judgment and perspective than do members of the general public.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.

Should major policy decision always be left to politicians and government experts or otherwise be involved with the public? In my humble view, it is true that political officials and field experts are more informed and insightful so that significant decisions should be mainly decided by themselves. In addition, under some circumstances, it is also infeasible to engage with the public. However, except the aforementioned cases, public officials should stick to their responsibility for the public.

To start off, I have to express my appreciation for both reason and claim part of this issue. On one hand, politicians and experts possess comprehensive knowledge and incisive foresight to make sensible decisions, since they are social elites who received more superior education that that of the public. Additionally, their predominant social positions endow them with greater advantage to access more inclusive information: more encyclopedic data even sensitive data are open to them, which facilitate them to make more sensible decisions. For supporting my point of view, we can no further go for Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal Policy. Leveraging economic theories learnt from in courses and economists, Roosevelt recognized incorrigible weaknesses of free market, which drive him to propose an imaginative combination between governmental regulation a free market strategy. Furthermore, with unique power of president, comprehensive statistics, such as industrial status, are all collected and represented to him, which serves to evince and adjust with his judgement.

Furthermore, under some circumstances, officials are not allowed to glean feedback from the public, thus, they have to rely on their own. In this first place, urgent incidents are prevalent in public security domain, in which split-second decision has to be made immediately. Under such situation, to initiate demotic survey and collect feedback would be too quixotic to deliver in-time solution. Also, it is highly likely that many policies might be engaged with sensitive information. As a result, once exposed to the public, we can easily foresee great risks accompanying by. Moreover, given such information is usually fraught with technical jargons, inquiring with the public might finally become in vain. China's nuclear weapon development in 1950s is a case in point. Confronted with external challenges during that time, leaders of the Republic of China has to depend on their own will to lay down development plan and kept confident for the demotic. Had they revealed to the public and waited for their response, such endeavor might be thwarted by rivals and turned in vain ultimately.

However, this doesn't mean that people's will and advice could be ignored during decision-making. Instead, politicians should always adhere to carry out people's desire. First of all, public officials' central role in regulating the public obliges them to work for their citizens' benefits. In addition, they are simultaneously citizens themselves, which give them unique insights and understanding of citizens' requests. In this sense, it is necessary for them to well trace with people's desires and represent them during laying down various policies. This is also one motive behind Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal Policy. Observing industrial workers plagued by unemployment and lack of sufficient job positions, Roosevelt further explored potential demand from the public security: mass of public constructions had been put forwards, which bring unemployed workers back to jobs. Such policy reflected with people's urgent need, and therefore had received wide applauded from lay-offs and the public as well.

In summary, politicians and government experts should hinge on their own judgement to make significant decision, because they are capable of doing so and special situations force them to do so. However, given their essential responsibility, it is compulsory to abide with the public and enact policies conforming to true desire of the demotic.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 281, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: that
...es who received more superior education that that of the public. Additionally, their pred...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Two successive sentences begin with the same adverb. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...vince and adjust with his judgement. Furthermore, under some circumstances, officials ar...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 746, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1950s'.
Suggestion: in the 1950s
...vain. Chinas nuclear weapon development in 1950s is a case in point. Confronted with ext...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 15, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ed in vain ultimately. However, this doesnt mean that peoples will and advice could...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, well, as to, in addition, in summary, such as, as a result, first of all, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 33.0505617978 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 95.0 58.6224719101 162% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3417.0 2235.4752809 153% => OK
No of words: 614.0 442.535393258 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5651465798 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.977853291 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97507613273 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 340.0 215.323595506 158% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553745928339 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 1061.1 704.065955056 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 4.38483146067 365% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.2370786517 153% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.9788759165 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.225806452 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8064516129 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.51612903226 5.21951772744 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211259700237 0.243740707755 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556167028027 0.0831039109588 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0835852060681 0.0758088955206 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143515926861 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0907390317211 0.0667264976115 136% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.1639044944 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.38706741573 114% => OK
difficult_words: 192.0 100.480337079 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.