Claim: Major policy decisions should always be left to politicians and other government experts.
Any policy or decision taken by the governement and other experts are the ones which directly or indirectly have an effect on the people concerning in that decision. Author here claims that the major policy decisions should always be left to politicians and the government experts by providing the reason that they are the ones who are much informed and thus, have a better judgement and perspective than the memenber so of the general public but I belive that people of the nation should be the ones to decide for it.
Policy or decisions are the ones which directly influence the life of a common person either for good or bad so, it is the right of a person to testify the decision. It has been long time since we entered into a era which supports democracy unlike the older times when we used to have heirarchy and dictatorship. The main agenda of any democratic government is that they are for the people, by the people and with the people therefore it is the right of member of the society to be involved the decision and policy concerning them. Although government is well informed but it might not always be true that they are aware of all the problems that are faced by the people for whom they are defining the policy. For instance, in India there are many coastal states that are prone to natural disasters are have to face them every year leaving behind a situation of a extreme grief and hardship. To help these people to recover from such damages government makes decisions and policies to provide with financial support and medical support but it might not be always possible that they have knowledge for what the people actually require at those times of hardship, it can be best understood only when the government involve those people in policy decision understanding there needs and helping them out by making such decision which act as a becon for prosperity in there lives.
Besides this it has been seen often that people make policy in order to benefit themselves from it instead of helping out the people from it therefore it is crucial to include general public in the decision making so that they can look and choose for there good whether the decision being made will be a boon or bane for them. It has happenend many times in the past that officials frame decisions in such a way that they have turned out to be disastorous for people therefore a check of general public will help to keep them in order like if we consider this above scenario with the help of an example where in government has taken a decision to sell out a property to a company for there development purpose which is home to a lot of poor people because they are able to make a handsome amount of comission from selling it. Because nobody from the public is involved in the decision there is no one to object against it and speak for those poor people.
However there are many decision which if kept within the reach of governement are better secure and protected like those related to nation's security involving infomation for defence, research which are very important for the nation's growth hence cannot be made accessible to everyone as this might compromise people security. Besides this there are certain decision that are not concerned with people and are of great personal value for the nation like the one of demonitization where in the governement took a big step to eradicate corruption and black money from nation.
Sharing of information among the general public is a choice which rest entirely on the fact that whom that decision concerns and effect. Moreover leaking such piece of information might not become a problem for nation security impacting the governement and the people itself but it should never happen that a decision have a negative impact on the lives of people as it is the people who make government making a nation democratic.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 429, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...perspective than the memenber so of the general public but I belive that people of the nation ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 211, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...as been long time since we entered into a era which supports democracy unlike the...
^
Line 3, column 803, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...that are prone to natural disasters are have to face them every year leaving behind ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 862, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...very year leaving behind a situation of a extreme grief and hardship. To help the...
^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Besides,
...becon for prosperity in there lives. Besides this it has been seen often that people...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 17, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[6]
Message: The adverb 'often' is usually put between 'has' and 'been'.
Suggestion: has often been seen
...rity in there lives. Besides this it has been seen often that people make policy in order to ben...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 177, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...m it therefore it is crucial to include general public in the decision making so that they can...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 489, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...storous for people therefore a check of general public will help to keep them in order like if...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...it and speak for those poor people. However there are many decision which if kept w...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 19, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun decision seems to be countable; consider using: 'many decisions'.
Suggestion: many decisions
...hose poor people. However there are many decision which if kept within the reach of gover...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 39, Rule ID: IF_IS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
... However there are many decision which if kept within the reach of governement ar...
^^
Line 7, column 226, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...search which are very important for the nations growth hence cannot be made accessible ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 34, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...on. Sharing of information among the general public is a choice which rest entirely on the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 138, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...whom that decision concerns and effect. Moreover leaking such piece of information might...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, but, hence, however, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 40.0 19.5258426966 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 14.8657303371 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 33.0 11.3162921348 292% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 61.0 33.0505617978 185% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 93.0 58.6224719101 159% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3192.0 2235.4752809 143% => OK
No of words: 678.0 442.535393258 153% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70796460177 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.10278680062 4.55969084622 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4729970225 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 281.0 215.323595506 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.414454277286 0.4932671777 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1053.9 704.065955056 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 45.0 23.0359550562 195% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 116.455694961 60.3974514979 193% => OK
Chars per sentence: 212.8 118.986275619 179% => OK
Words per sentence: 45.2 23.4991977007 192% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.21951772744 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 14.0 7.80617977528 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278202262088 0.243740707755 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108698747674 0.0831039109588 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102587483305 0.0758088955206 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18705891195 0.150359130593 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142801148579 0.0667264976115 214% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.4 14.1392134831 165% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 48.8420337079 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.8 12.1743820225 171% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.93 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 100.480337079 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.8971910112 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 20.0 11.2143820225 178% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.