Claim: Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system.
Reason: Laws cannot change what is in people's hearts or minds.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
So many issues of the contemporary community cannot be resolved through rules and the legal mechanism, since laws cannot alter citizens' way of thinking, feeling, or behaving. That is the speaker's contention, and I tend to wholly disagree with it. To my way of thinking, the presented claim and the justification upon which it is based fail to take into consideration some essential aspects of the topic, and the following essay will outline the reasons behind my take on the subject at hand.
To begin with, my primary problem is with the speaker's claim itself which just wrongly and unfairly tries to undermine the efficacious role of the legal systen in solving a society's problems. In my view, reasonable legislation is in fact capable of successfully dealing with social issues, provided that they are persistently and incessantly emphasized on by policymakers and law enforcement agents. By way of illustration, in my home country when at first officials decided to mandate fastening car seat belts, there was a type of social defiance from the majority of the citizens, who thought of the newly introduced law as a bothering action, with the result that some
started doubting about the feasibility of inuring the general population to abiding by the rule. However, after the central government demonstrated considerable perseverence in conducting the scheme, fastening seat belt gradually became a new normal among the mejority of the ordinary people. In short, assuming that the laws of a nations have been regulated in a sensible manner, regarding such rules as being unable to resolve social matters appear to be an unjust view.
What is more, my next issue is with the speaker's given reason for his/her claim. It basically tries to convey the message that changing what is in people's hearts or minds plays an essential role in solving social problem. Yet it is entirely possible that everything that is in people's hearts or thoughts are not necessarily reasonable or mature enough to be considered as the area which should so as to resolve the issues. For instance, in a society where a remarkable fraction of the general populace consists of illiterate citizens with actually no idea regarding how to solve the challenging problems of today's globe, it seems to be the responsibily of the intellectuals and
scholars of that society to start grappling with the real-world tough issues by means of introducing highly effective and sensible regulations. Hence, basing the act of finding
solutions to social problems on altering people's heart or minds, instead of setting appropriate laws, is another reason why the presented notion of the speaker renders unconvincing as I see.
On balance, I feel that the given claim and the reason on which it is based fail to take into account some vital aspects of the subject at hand, with the result that it remains unbale to convince me.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 188, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'speakers'' or 'speaker's'?
Suggestion: speakers'; speaker's
...king, feeling, or behaving. That is the speakers contention, and I tend to wholly disagr...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 330, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a nation' or simply 'nations'?
Suggestion: a nation; nations
...le. In short, assuming that the laws of a nations have been regulated in a sensible manne...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 360, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a sensible manner" with adverb for "sensible"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...e laws of a nations have been regulated in a sensible manner, regarding such rules as being unable t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 395, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... be considered as the area which should so as to resolve the issues. For instance, in a ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that it remains unbale to convince me.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, hence, however, if, regarding, so, as to, for instance, i feel, in fact, in short, in my view, to begin with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 84.0 58.6224719101 143% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2439.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 478.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10251046025 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67581127817 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8389583837 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 215.323595506 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543933054393 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 762.3 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 14.0 4.38483146067 319% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 23.0359550562 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 87.1032696966 60.3974514979 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 174.214285714 118.986275619 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.1428571429 23.4991977007 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92857142857 5.21951772744 190% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318259777905 0.243740707755 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103559234177 0.0831039109588 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514298299361 0.0758088955206 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132351161637 0.150359130593 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0755358173439 0.0667264976115 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.7 14.1392134831 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.97 48.8420337079 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 12.1743820225 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.38706741573 117% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 100.480337079 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 11.2143820225 139% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.7820224719 170% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.