Claim: The surest indicator of a great nation is not the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists.
Reason: The surest indicator of a great nation is actually the welfare of all its people.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
Definitely, it is true that the symbol of a great nation is actually the welfare of all its people rather than the achievements of its rulers, artists or scientists. It is flawed to assume that the country success is measured by the achievement of its rulers, artists or scientists rather than the prosperity of its people. Thus, the best way to measure country’s success is actually measured through the people achievement.
Firstly, the greatness of the nation is defined by the welfare of its people. The indigenous population directly impart their role to indicate the definition of a great nation. People’s freedom of speech, living, their hardship for survival and the accessibility towards technology are the parameters to define the achievement of a great nation. For instance, People living in the certain part of the country X do hardship to earn their living although the success of its rulers is worldly.
Secondly, there are certain countries in the world whose economic activities are dominating in the world through selling of petroleum products likewise Sudan, although people living in this parts struggles for a single grain of rice due to lack of fertile land for agriculture. People are bereft of education, shelter and health facilities. The country is suffering from civil wars and some local terrorist organization is gaining support from local people as they speak in favor of people rights. Although, the country is achieving economic boom; but, the people is facing tremendous problems to earning its way of life.
Thirdly, the destruction of two major cities of Japan Hiroshima and Nagasaki during second World war had led Japan to face economic crisis through the mass destruction of its resources and its property. The act of some rulers had led Japanese people to face the suffering or destruction during world war. The Japanese people had suffered from poverty and food crisis along with the devastation of their industry as well as economic activity. With the aids from America, Japan slowly gaining economic reforms by utilizing local manpower; blocking foreign imports and utilizing maximum local goods. With the skyrocketing between the years 1950 to 1970 in industrial revolution, Japan slightly increases the people’s economic conditions and standard of living. In today’s world, Japan has become the fastest country in east Asia to achieve the saturation of Economic development. It was the will of certain leader where the Japan had to bear the casualties of Second world war leading their people to suffer from devastation of livestock and food crisis.
Moreover, some scientific findings have large consequences with the daily life of common people. Scientific achievement in developing robots in replacing the man force in industries has led many people deprived of jobs leading in increasing in unemployment in the countries which directly increase the hardship among people. Similarly, the implementation of reservation system by some ruler to earn the compassion of some backward societies has led true energetic young people bereft of qualification in getting admission in universities and some reputation job opportunities.
Thus, it is well remarkable to indicate the success of the country through the welfare of its people rather than the achievement of its ruler, scientist and artists.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 186, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...kewise Sudan, although people living in this parts struggles for a single grain of r...
^^^^
Line 4, column 546, Rule ID: FOREIGN_IMPORT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'imports'.
Suggestion: imports
...s by utilizing local manpower; blocking foreign imports and utilizing maximum local goods. With...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, firstly, if, likewise, moreover, second, secondly, similarly, so, third, thirdly, thus, well, for instance, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 12.4196629213 8% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 88.0 58.6224719101 150% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2823.0 2235.4752809 126% => OK
No of words: 530.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32641509434 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79809637944 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86557065766 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467924528302 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 866.7 704.065955056 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.033690368 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.318181818 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0909090909 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 5.21951772744 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239940028169 0.243740707755 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0859817638069 0.0831039109588 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0926392627724 0.0758088955206 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15623065225 0.150359130593 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0989468204354 0.0667264976115 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 145.0 100.480337079 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.