People should question the rules of authority as opposed to accepting them passively Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and | TOEFL IELTS GMAT GRE SAT ACT PTE ESL

Essay topics:

People should question the rules of authority as opposed to accepting them passively.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

Glancing back through modern history, one will undoubtedly notice that many remarkable changes have been sparked by people questioning the rules of authority. One might argue that outcomes of these changes have weighted both the good and bad sides of human history and that questioning the authority might go wrong or it may be dangerous. But, the consequences of dangerous part are not due to the questioning to authority, it is due to action by the involvement of people. Questioning the authority helps to reveal the changes necessary within the established institution. Thus, I strongly agree with the statement that people should question the rules of authority as opposed to accepting them passively.
One might look through Indian history of independence, where Mahatma Gandhi through his non cooperative movement helped India to make free from British Empire. Mahatma Gandhi started nonviolence protest and asked frequently the British authority to leave India. His questioning to authority not only inspire others but motivates others to join in his nonviolence protest. Finally, his regular questioning helps India to become independence and also helps social and political stability within the country.
Looking back the formation of the United State of America, British ruler used to charge unfair taxes among the citizen in their colonies and treated them in accordance to British law until some power men questioned the British rule and stood up to defend them and finally built an independent entity. Their questioning to British regime helped the leader to establish the different authority stance than the British. The United states finally became a democratic country with their own represented leader by their own people. Thus, questioning to authority not only brought social and political changes but also helps shaping the future of American people and made United states one of the most powerful nation of the World.
Similarly, but most extreme the people of France in 18th century used to live in delusion that their monarch was ordained by God for many years. Their live was full of hardship, starvation and greed but their monarch used to live untainted palatial lives. Finally, masses came to question the monarchy rules and finally the monarch system was overthrown. After the monarch collapse, some radical group came into power and criticizing the harsh rule of previous authority and finally they were successful to establish republic government with their assistance of questioning their authority and made their country free from some tyrannical rulers.

In today’s world, we can see the differences between questioning the authority verses accepting them passively in South Korea and North Korea respectively. In South Korea due to establishment of democracy through people struggles and regularly questioning the government, development works are going rapidly. South Korea gave us a two brand company Hyundai and Samsung whose products are globally ruling. Whereas, in north Korea the dictatorship still persists. North Korean lives under the decision of one people wills and have to follow his decision passively. There is a ban of television as well as internet service where people are dearth of information all around the world.
However, some might claim that questioning the authority implies violent action in the case of civil change and leads to mass destruction; argue this is the consequences of questioning the authority. This is actually not the case, it depends upon the will of individual who is in authority and consequences are the result of its decision. It is always not true questioning the authority leads a prosperous society but it might lead to blockage in development works, segregation as well as hindrance in progress. For example: People representative in an upper house to serve the constituent and solving the problem of society as well as social hindrance. Their decision might affect some privileged society but favor and cover large group of people which might segregate population and hindrance of progress as well.
In general, society cannot be imagined without questioning the authority. It is the right as well as responsibility of every citizen to question their authority to bring change in social as well as political status. There must be some relevancy in questioning the authority otherwise it may hindrance the development work and segregate population.

Votes

Essay Categories

GMAT/GRE Issue Task

Comments

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 618, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to shape' or 'shape'.
Suggestion: to shape; shape
...al and political changes but also helps shaping the future of American people and made ...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 406, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ung whose products are globally ruling. Whereas, in north Korea the dictatorship still ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, however, if, look, may, similarly, so, still, thus, well, whereas, for example, in general, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 32.0 14.8657303371 215% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 97.0 58.6224719101 165% => OK
Nominalization: 30.0 12.9106741573 232% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3749.0 2235.4752809 168% => OK
No of words: 699.0 442.535393258 158% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36337625179 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.14184870769 4.55969084622 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8220884916 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 327.0 215.323595506 152% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467811158798 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1180.8 704.065955056 168% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.2370786517 153% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9481651518 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.935483871 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5483870968 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25806451613 5.21951772744 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 5.13820224719 272% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176247643864 0.243740707755 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0510299127449 0.0831039109588 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057934578751 0.0758088955206 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0885075527325 0.150359130593 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398098792246 0.0667264976115 60% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 162.0 100.480337079 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, however, if, look, may, similarly, so, still, thus, well, whereas, for example, in general, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments