Claim: We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own
Reason: Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.
Our everyday life is filled with numerous conversations and controversies. In terms of learning as well, we cannot help but face potential obstacles in implementing our thoughts. Nevertheless, it is becoming more important to be exposed to those who do not share our own thoughts than those who share the same view. This essay will provide several reasons and examples in terms of buttressing the idea.
To begin with, it may be plausible to think of factors that cause stress and hamper developing our ideas when faced with views that contradict our thoughts. Not to mention the daily patterns in which we get annoyed by people who are nettlesome in trivial topics, it has been a constant concern in terms of implementing issues that are crucial to alleviate the current political, cultural, or environmental problem. For example, notwithstanding the importance of the legitimation of the filibuster as a function of maintaining a democratic atmosphere in political agendas, it frequently led to a delay of resolution and hindrance of practical approaches. Even though a well-intentional agenda is being raised, various ideas and attitudes that are contradictory to the gist of the idea impedes realising the thought into practice. Thus, it is likely to say that contradicting ideas and thoughts can be an obstacle for the achievement of the original initiatives.
Nevertheless, it is undeniable that we are more and more surrounded by people who have varying ideas due to globalisation and the development of communication devices. This tendency of growing importance in communication propels the necessity to challenge against differential attitudes. New devices and means of communication result not only to a challenging environment in which unexpected controversies can be aroused but also to a philosophical rudimentation in terms of language and identity. That is, as it has become possible that we do not have to depend solely on the customary language and text, we are able to extend the means of communication to the limit of our imagination. In addition, we realize that we ourselves are groups of split ideas and identities through which we sometimes undergo anxiety and confusion. This means that the current era urges us to be as openly as we could in order to adapt in the changing environment and culture.
Furthermore, the very ethics of democracy consists of such varying ideas and thoughts, which preserves the ethics of diversity and liberalism. For instance, a significant number of articles of public news depicts a landscape in which the agora teems with conflicting ideals. The contemporary struggle in terms of gender equality seems to be adulterated by extreme and factious parties and prolonged discussions, but there is an acknowledgement that conflicts are inevitable in order to change the fundamental basis of social structure. History proves it with bountiful examples and proxies that only through contradiction can any change be accomplished.
The conclusion now stands that it is of the utmost importance that we should be communicative and open to different thoughts than just follow a group of people who share the same ideas. Not only history urges us to, but also the very ethics of democracy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...les in terms of buttressing the idea. To begin with, it may be plausible to t...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ievement of the original initiatives. Nevertheless, it is undeniable that we ...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the changing environment and culture. Furthermore, the very ethics of democra...
^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ction can any change be accomplished. The conclusion now stands that it is of ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 25.0 11.3162921348 221% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 79.0 58.6224719101 135% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2729.0 2235.4752809 122% => OK
No of words: 519.0 442.535393258 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25818882466 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7730044521 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25063302497 2.79657885939 116% => OK
Unique words: 267.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514450867052 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 870.3 704.065955056 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7725536714 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.952380952 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52380952381 5.21951772744 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207821023071 0.243740707755 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0564314357747 0.0831039109588 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518030714778 0.0758088955206 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11324806117 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519804091508 0.0667264976115 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.8420337079 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.38706741573 114% => OK
difficult_words: 155.0 100.480337079 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.