Claim: We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own.
Reason: Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claims is based.
It is said that birds of same feather flocks together, that means same kind of people of people who share common views with one another stays together. In my not so humble opinion, I agree with the claim that we can learn much more from people whose views we share from those whose view contradicts our own.
To begin with, people mostly feel comfortable with people of their own thinking, so it is blatant that they will have good tuning among themselves which will lead to good understanding. But, on the other hand if two individual don’t share same thinking then they will not feel comfortable with each other and it is plausible that their views will not match and they won’t anything from each other. For instance, one can exemplify in politics if two ministers thinking is not matching then one of those form opposition party and start opposing other person. From this we can say that if two people thinking are not matching they will always end up in disagreement.
However, sometime sharing common views also depends on the background or past. If two individual has share common experience in the past than it is blatant that they will bolster each other’s argument and they will learn from that. For instance, if we consider two teachers from two different collages they will share their experience of teaching with each other more comfortably than to some other person who doesn’t come from same profession. This happens because both individual have some common experience of teaching and they will even learn from each other experience.
Furthermore, in the field of education it is seen that some students don’t like some of their professor or teachers views that effect on teaching also. No matter how good teacher is if students point of view is contradicting the teachers view than it is possible that student will not get entice with that teacher teaching. For instance, if a teacher is having one point of view on concept which she/he is teaching and student is having other than it is blatant that they might end up arguing with one another which will effect on learning. In this case it is plausible that student will not learn anything from that professor.
To sum up, we can learn much better from those whose view we share then from those whose view contradict our own. If we try to learn from those whose view contradicts it may happen that his/her view attenuates our views or vice versa.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 77, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'of people'.
Suggestion: of people
...r flocks together, that means same kind of people of people who share common views with one another...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 147, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
... teachers views that effect on teaching also. No matter how good teacher is if stude...
^^^^
Line 7, column 522, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
... up arguing with one another which will effect on learning. In this case it is plausib...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 236, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iew attenuates our views or vice versa.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, then, for instance, kind of, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 26.0 11.3162921348 230% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 63.0 33.0505617978 191% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2018.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 420.0 442.535393258 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80476190476 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40742426879 2.79657885939 86% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.409523809524 0.4932671777 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 585.9 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1181374232 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.125 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.25 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 5.21951772744 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348775870343 0.243740707755 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153698229172 0.0831039109588 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.161361977448 0.0758088955206 213% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258065645709 0.150359130593 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.163965135041 0.0667264976115 246% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 48.8420337079 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.07 8.38706741573 84% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 100.480337079 57% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.