Claim: When planning courses, educators should take into account the interests and suggestions of their students. Reason: Students are more motivated to learn when they are interested in what they are studying.
With regard to the fact that whether the choice and interest of students must be taken into consideration or not, plethora of perspectives have been put forward. Some believes that universities should not consider students’ interest and should plan courses which leads to lucrative and profitable job. However the writer is of the view that students’ enthusiasm must be considered when planning the courses. As far as I’m concerned, I really agree with either the claim or reason put forth by the writer because I find them logical.
In the first place, interesting courses give rise to the hardworking by students which in turn lead to the success. Students try hard and eagerly to study their subjects which gives them confidence and happiness when they study subjects which they are passionate about them. How a student who is interested in art must be oblique to study medicine? Maybe because it was considered to be a prestigious or lucrative job. Is he really become a successful doctor? If students do not interested in their subject, they cannot study hard and maybe they cannot attend the class. Besides, they see no compelling reason to pass their exams and finally they may fail which causes a real sadness and disappointment. Moreover, it may adversely affects their confidence.
Secondly, Students who study subjects which is interesting to them can dedicate to their courses and try hard to finish their courses successfully. Therefore, they can eagerly work in the field which they really like it and become successful. On the other hand, consider a doctor who is interested in art or music, although he has a lucrative job and can easily earn money but he is not so satisfied in his job because it was not his choice and educators or even parents decided he must become a doctor to gain success and earn more money. How can he work enthusiastically and how can he become successful although his work is considered prestigious and lucrative?
However, it is advisable to strike a balance between planning subjects which is interesting to students and also planning for successful careers. Student should not forgot that they also must take in to consideration the future of their lives which a lucrative and profitable job is one of them. Studing an interesting course but do not have a suitable job also may cause a negative effect to one’s confidence.
In conclusion, I really agree with either the claim or reason put forth by the writer because I find them convincing. The interesting course give rise to the hardworking by students which in turn leads to success, confidence and happiness. They can eagerly work in the field which they really like it and become successful or even lucrative.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 308, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... leads to lucrative and profitable job. However the writer is of the view that students...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 165, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'forget'
Suggestion: forget
... successful careers. Student should not forgot that they also must take in to consider...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 416, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gative effect to one's confidence. In conclusion, I really agree with eithe...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, however, if, may, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, in conclusion, with regard to, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 14.8657303371 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2281.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 457.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99124726477 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62358717085 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87126071776 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.411378555799 0.4932671777 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 705.6 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5534605708 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.681818182 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7727272727 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.13636363636 5.21951772744 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284314730437 0.243740707755 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0926373902243 0.0831039109588 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564610617216 0.0758088955206 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173617845311 0.150359130593 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0481723038437 0.0667264976115 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.