Claim: When planning courses, educators should take into account the interests and suggestions of their students.
Reason: Students are more motivated to learn when they are interested in what they are studying.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
Learning is a challenge because everyone intakes information differently from one another. In almost all types of courses, there is most likely one student who is dozing off while the professor is lecturing. The claim states that educators should acknowledge their student’s recommendations and interests in regards to course planning. Similar to other areas of work, it is important for a leader to the account for the needs of their pupils beyond their parochial perspective.
Courses are planned on what educators believe is best for the student, though it may have been years or even decades since these people have found themselves in the student’s seat. By listening to their students, educators can better adopt courses that are best suited for the scholars. Students can advocate for special electives, relevant courses, or classes that are atypical in education. Not all ideas have to be accepted, but it is good to adapt coursework based on the needs of their students. Learning should not be limited to the basic subjects that we are all too familiar with: English, history, math, science, and art. There should be cooking courses, more hands-on learning, or special projects that help students learn effectively. With an array of courses, students will have a holistic learning experience.
Accepting student recommendations changes the learning environment for the better when students know that their voices are being heard. They don’t feel insignificant when it comes to their educational choices. With education being more open, students are more inclined to participate, motivated to learn, and excel in their studies. The acknowledgement tremendously transforms their behavior, perception, and ability to perform. As a guidance, educators should path the way for these young minds, but also have a cooperative stance. By opening these door for scholars to actively partake will change the way student act during their time in school and in their future careers. This creates a fundamental behavior for students to advocate for their beliefs, future careers, and so much more. They are better prepared for what follows afterwards.
With that said, educators don’t necessarily have to account all the interests and suggestions provided to them by students. They must maintain an active role in paving the route towards success for students. All recommendations should be looked at carefully and accommodated if they find necessary. A properly planned coursework requiring the fundamentals of education is essential, but there must be some leeway for student’s to also have an active voice. Core coursework should include basic courses like English, math, science, history, and so on. Education professionals have the resources and knowledge to make the best choices for the future of society.
The claim makes a fair statement in regards to keeping an open mind towards student suggestions and interests. It will help provide educators a sense of what will motive their students to be successful in school. But they must also maintain the core classes to ensure the well-roundedness of students. Always keep an open ear because everyone wants to be heard, especially those in lower positions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 311, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...nt's recommendations and interests in regards to course planning. Similar to other areas...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 550, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this door' or 'these doors'?
Suggestion: this door; these doors
...o have a cooperative stance. By opening these door for scholars to actively partake will c...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 34, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...y. The claim makes a fair statement in regards to keeping an open mind towards student su...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, so, well, while, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2742.0 2235.4752809 123% => OK
No of words: 506.0 442.535393258 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41897233202 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7428307748 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95741199 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 215.323595506 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50395256917 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 834.3 704.065955056 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 11.0 1.77640449438 619% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.7290540528 60.3974514979 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.5517241379 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4482758621 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.79310344828 5.21951772744 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 24.0 10.2758426966 234% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287626357825 0.243740707755 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0836449889983 0.0831039109588 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513405827731 0.0758088955206 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168822251868 0.150359130593 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291238274269 0.0667264976115 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 141.0 100.480337079 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.