College students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field.
Should a college student pursue subjects of his interest or should he pursue courses having highest probability of employment? I concede that a safe bet is to pursue high in-demand field but one may never excel in such a field when his real interest lies in some other field.
Jobs are an ever changing market, years ago noone would have believed that jobs of employees in grocery store chains would be in threat due to automation as seen today in various amazon grocery stores. So, high dependency on statistics of job availability for selecting one’s career path may hinder real progress as even after getting a job, it may be done perfunctorily just for earning a salary.
Having real interest in subjects chosen will encourage students to work harder automatically making the chances of getting employment easier. Even after getting employment, attaining promotions and climbing the ladder would be straightforward. Encouraging students to pursue their real interest will produce imminent scientists, businessmans, painters, doctors etc. who will significantly contribute back to the society.
It is a well known fact that the chances of achieving success in sports or artistic fields are less as compared to technical fields. So, if Picasso, Da vinci, Beethoven were told to pursue fields with more jobs, the world would be devoid of great works of art. Similarly, various inventors like wright brothers, graham bell were told to pursue fields that would give them employment, the conveniences of modern life may have been delayed or not existed.
In general, considering availability of jobs as one of the factors for choosing one’s career path may be plausible but being highly dependent on such statistics may hinder one to excel and contribute to the society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 86, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'having the highest'.
Suggestion: having the highest
...is interest or should he pursue courses having highest probability of employment? I concede th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 408, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ho will significantly contribute back to the society. It is a well known fact ...
^^
Line 7, column 101, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...s in sports or artistic fields are less as compared to technical fields. So, if Pi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, similarly, so, well, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 33.0505617978 36% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1500.0 2235.4752809 67% => OK
No of words: 287.0 442.535393258 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22648083624 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8292296731 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.599303135889 0.4932671777 121% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 704.065955056 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3661033519 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9166666667 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.21951772744 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212805125492 0.243740707755 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716446579323 0.0831039109588 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527865772656 0.0758088955206 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109657500164 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690587652349 0.0667264976115 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.