Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance.
The statement contends that the salary of a teacher should directly depend on their students performance. I concede that implementing it as one of the factor affecting salary would give proffesors extra motivation to teach better and guide the students constantly. However, making it a sole factor to decide a teacher’s salary would be injustifiable and prove to be ineffective.
Teaching is a highly respected proffession that comes with huge deal of responsibility as a teacher plays significant role in shaping a student. Academic performance of the teacher’s class may seem like a valid criteria to judge his teaching ability, however if the students are unwilling to learn: best quality of teaching could also fail. For example in many universities one has to take extra electives that are not connected to one’s major, so there is a high possibility that one will not focus on the elective as much as his majors.
Another major problem about the suggesstion is that the subject’s complexity is not taken into account. Most people would agree that english or painting is a relatively easier subject than maths and science. So, there is a high chance that the same students would perform extraordinarily in english but poorly in maths. This would lead to a dissatisfaction among maths teachers as even if they taught really well they would be paid scarcely.
One other major problem with the statement is that it may lead teachers to give higher grades to the students even for poor performances just for higher salary. It may create a state of chaos with incorrect evaluation of students and a dissatisfaction among students who worked really hard but got the same grade as others. Students may also stop studying as a good grade is implicit. The number of students taking the subjectcan also play an important role. For several universities, students are provided with an option to choose the elective subjects they prefer. This would lead to some elective being selected by large proportion of students and some chosen by relatively few students. This may create a bias among teachers.
In sum, implementing students performance as one of the factor affecting salary may instill extra motivation in teachers to perform better. However the disadvantages overweigh them and thus implementing it would be highly ineffective.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'criterion'?
Suggestion: criterion
...e teacher’s class may seem like a valid criteria to judge his teaching ability, however ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 298, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ': the best'.
Suggestion: : the best
...r if the students are unwilling to learn: best quality of teaching could also fail. Fo...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 141, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...tivation in teachers to perform better. However the disadvantages overweigh them and th...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, really, so, still, thus, well, as to, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1970.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 381.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17060367454 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96045773033 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514435695538 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 615.6 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0949849 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.684210526 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0526315789 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.10526315789 5.21951772744 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323398837995 0.243740707755 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0991994223495 0.0831039109588 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0913673485855 0.0758088955206 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191563550051 0.150359130593 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0893662381899 0.0667264976115 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.