College students should be encouraged to pursue subjects that interest them rather than the courses that seem most likely to lead to jobs.
We are in the 21st century, where technology is making tremenduous progress and other fields like arts and e-commerce are blooming. College students, who are considered as powerful youth and future of the country are in a rat race of achieveing the best; which cannot be considered as their fault. We live in a society where we are taught that earning a decent amount of money will define how successful you are, and thus, all college students tend to pursue subjects hat seem most likely to lead to jobs.
On the other hand, it is definitely a good sign that a part of student community are trying to walk away from the herd and try to follow their own passion instead of undermining their own interests in pursuit of job security. Few students who pursue subjects that interests them end up being extremely successful in that field; which is very encouraging. Such students not only follow their passion, but also live a happy life they always wanted.
On the contrary, it is also true that many students who follow their passion by pursuing subject of their own interest end up losing everything because of certain circumstances; and it becomes very tough to survive in such conditions without having any support; which increases the rate of unemployment. A student who is afraid of taking risks and wants a stable life, will always make the compromise of their interest in order to get a secured job.
If we have a decent job, then we get decent amount of money, and we continue to thrive on the basis of whatever we earn. Job can always guarantee you a decent and stable life with less downs and more ups. Subjects that seem most likely to lead to jobs tend to open up many other opportunities for yourself. For example, Alex is a student who studies science, so she has many option to choose her path from. But, John, who is extremely talented in painting, and wants to pursue painting as his career, he would have very little to choose because he has not learnt anything new which would open new opportunities from him.
We all agree that money is an indivisible part of our lives, and thus, all the students are always encouraged to earn more money, to gain a good stature in the society. Students who are passionate about their hobbies and talents often end up struggling for their entire lives and are lost in the frustration. Eventually, they end up doing something which highly undermines their skills in order to survive; which is the worst thing that should happen to any student.
Thus, it should be entirely upto the student what path he/she wants to choose for his life, instead of encouraging them to pursue subjects of their interests. It is a decision taken independantly by the student, and should remain pure without any outside influence or encouragement. Students are future of the country and the authorities must be wise enough to guide them to a better future instead of encouraging them to pursue their own talent, because it might go downhill after a while.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 181, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun downs is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...antee you a decent and stable life with less downs and more ups. Subjects that seem ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 371, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun option seems to be countable; consider using: 'many options'.
Suggestion: many options
...student who studies science, so she has many option to choose her path from. But, John, who...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, thus, while, for example, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.3162921348 203% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 53.0 33.0505617978 160% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2481.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 523.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74378585086 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78217453174 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56892313306 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483747609943 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 766.8 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8433142839 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.578947368 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5263157895 23.4991977007 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.47368421053 5.21951772744 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287061489601 0.243740707755 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0931985995029 0.0831039109588 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0760171070964 0.0758088955206 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154703418063 0.150359130593 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565838673303 0.0667264976115 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 48.8420337079 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 12.1743820225 103% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.