Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach.
A person's familiarity with a field, can be pondered by his or her ability to apply that knowledge in the real world. Since, a teacher is someone who guides his or her students, he or she must be well furnished about the applications of a field in the real world and he or she must also be able to convey these applications to the students. Hence, I agree with the policy that colleges and universitites should require all of its faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in the professions relevant to the courses they teach.
It is a widely known fact that knowledge gained through experience will have a great impact on us as compared to the knowledge gained by traditional means like reading or listening. Therefore, empiricism is an effective learning method, but for the faculty to incorparate such techniques in their teaching, they themselves must be aware of the knowledge gained through experiences. Hence, professors who spend some time working outside the academic world in professions related to the courses they teach, will be acquainted with the real world applications of a field and they will be able to teach their students with emphasis on the practical applications of the field.
Most students take up courses in schools and universities to make a career in that particular field. Colleges and universities offer courses that are rich in theory, but this will not be suffice when a student tries to enter the professional world, as it requires an indiviual to have a knowledge of the real world workings. Hence, if professors are required to have a professional experience, then they can help design a curriculum that can train the students for the professional world.
Professors who have spent some time working outside the academic world, can help the students to have a successful career by guiding about the requirements in the professional world and the skills they need to develop. They can train their students to be a good working professional.
Professors having a completely academical approach to teaching is not always a bane as academical approach covers all the concepts ina field but if a professor tunes his or her course based on his or her professional experience then the concepts covered in the course will be limited and will be confined to the professors experience outside the academic world. For a student to become a successful professional, he or she must have abundant knowledge on the field, which can help them solve any kind of crisis in their profession. Hence, the professors should not modify the course based on their professional experience but they should rather emphasise on the industrial requirement while covering all the concepts.
Hence, the policy can be beneficial for students who wish to make a career in the field that they are pursuing.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 3, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
A persons familiarity with a field, can be ponder...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 135, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cal approach covers all the concepts ina field but if a professor tunes his or he...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, then, therefore, well, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2353.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 473.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97463002114 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66353547975 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91419821841 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.401691331924 0.4932671777 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 729.0 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 23.0359550562 135% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.6995644187 60.3974514979 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.866666667 118.986275619 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.5333333333 23.4991977007 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.21951772744 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359897433189 0.243740707755 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143186016976 0.0831039109588 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.174700176085 0.0758088955206 230% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193857541534 0.150359130593 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0865639438568 0.0667264976115 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 14.1392134831 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.14 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.2143820225 128% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.7820224719 161% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.