Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position
In every graduation ceremony, there is one or the other speech which try to convey the message that "the real journey begins now". After number of late night studies and passing numerous tough exams, life after graduation is still not easy and we realize that the work field teaches us so many more things. The given prompt presents a policy that the faculty of colleges and universities should work outside their academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach. I observe such policy as an opportunity for the faculty to learn from their work field, and consequently, the lessons they learnt will be delivered also to the students they have been teaching. It is salubrious for both the students and the faculty members.
Firstly, work field can teach one many more things than just teaching inside the classroom. The faculty member will be exposed to the current technologies, different work environment and pragmatic methodologies. For example, a law teacher might be able to understand more about recent ammendments when he or she will get to work as a lawyer in the court. When he or she will be able to apply the law that he or she had been teaching, his or her level of understanding will be increased. The more the teacher comprehends the more efficiently he or she will be able to deliver. Similarly, in the field of science, doctors, engineers and professions of that ilk learn more from working in their respective field rather than from mere theoritical knowledge. Therefore, as the teacher will get an exposure to different perspectives while working, he or she will also be to deliver to the students.
Secondly, such policy might also bring significant changes in the style of teaching. When one works only in the field of academic, he or she will not be able to determine whether their method of teaching is beneficial for the students or not. As the faculty members work themselves, they might realize the gulf between the materials taught and the real application of the education in work field. Thus, the experience from working in their respective professions might help them to bridge the gap between the things taught in the universities and knowledge required for being a competent worker.
Lastly, such policy will obviously help the faculty members to be financially stable and will prevent the monotonous life as a teacher. The desire of a professor to contribute to their professional field and the academic field will go hand in hand. Some may argue that working in both the fields might hamper the schedule and efficiency of the professor, but when there already is a policy mandating the professor to work then the schedule will also be managed aptly. In fact, it will aid the professor in maintaining efficiency in both the fields.
Be it be professors of science or literature, every academicans require experience in their respective field so that they themselves can grow and learn as per the modern scenarios and also prepare the students accordingly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 259, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...ic field will go hand in hand. Some may argue that working in both the fields might h...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, similarly, so, still, then, therefore, thus, while, for example, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2511.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 506.0 442.535393258 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96245059289 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7428307748 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78106218815 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.450592885375 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 767.7 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7513158701 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.571428571 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0952380952 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.21951772744 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160898203241 0.243740707755 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636234196646 0.0831039109588 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0874464902432 0.0758088955206 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106205270494 0.150359130593 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0825787551105 0.0667264976115 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.