Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is better to work as a team than as an individual to succeed.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Some people prefer to work as a team for their convenience or for different other reasons. However, I do not concur with the stance that team work is better than to work individually in order to succeed for the following three reasons.
First of all, when one works as a team, time management becomes a huge problem. For group discussion or for allocating the tasks, the team members will have to meet time and again. But as people will have different priorities in their lives, it will be a tough task to set a time or a day aside when everyone would be willing to come together. I remember running after each team members to fix a suitable time for practice when I participated in a dance competition as a group. It wasted my time which I could have dedicated to groom my dance steps. Even though there might have been different other factors, I feel like we did not win the competition because of lack of practice due to the time management problem. Had I participated alone and utilized my time to practice, I could have won. I have observed such similar scenarios also in other teams. Such unnecessary burden could deviate one's attention and act as an impediment to success.
Secondly, working as a team will require proper allocation of the task among the team members. This task is itself a very troublesome; additionally, it will also hinder one from learning every aspect of the work. For example, in a car company, if one builds the car by himself or herself, then she or he will have complete knowledge about development of that car. On the contrary, if the same task is divided among two, both will not be able to gain complete experience. Suppose one makes the engine and other works on the tires, then the person working on the engine will be unaware about the tires and similar would be the case for the other person. In case the car does not work, there are chances of blame game. Therefore, such complications like arguments during division of task, decrease in accountability and many more will disturb the team from succeeding. Thus, it is better to work individually where one will take the complete responsibility and solve problems on their own. Such scenario would be conducive to success than the former one.
Lastly, because of the fear of one member getting credited for success, the work environment might be malignant while working as a team. I have a bitter experience when I was given the opportunity to present a presentation on the behalf of the team in an international competition. But one of my team members was so jealous that he deleted my file and unfortunately, we as a team lost the opportunity to win. However, if I had prepared the presentation individually, there would not be such insecurity and unnecessary rivalry. Hence, such fear and jealousy could hinder success while working as a team.
All in all, because of the reasons stated above, I contend that it is better to work as an individual in order to succeed rather than as a team.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 892, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
.... Such unnecessary burden could deviate ones attention and act as an impediment to s...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for example, i feel, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2468.0 1977.66487455 125% => OK
No of words: 527.0 407.700716846 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68311195446 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79129216042 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75276418278 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.462998102467 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 805.5 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8327576559 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9230769231 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2692307692 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.69230769231 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169128814768 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0569904894741 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.078452542122 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147404394875 0.150856017488 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0919758837812 0.0645574589148 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.