Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented above.
The intended purpose of education is not only to open up a career for an individual, it's role is also to develop him or her as a person with moral values who will work for the welfare of the society in different forms. The given prompt presents two disparate approaches with an aim to produce a moral society: one, that supports teaching morality as foundation of education, and second, that supports teaching logical reasoning. I mostly agree that moral education is the cornerstone in building a moral society.
Firstly, logical reasoning teaches solution of a problem in a systematic way based on evidences and facts. But in real intricate life, we encounter different circumstances where such logic do not make any sense. For example, if a train ticket checker sees a poor man who can not even afford a train ticket but has to travel to visit his sick parents, then his morals will take over instead of logic. As a kind person, he will understand the circumstances and might allow the person to travel. If logical reasoning leads to moral society, then why engineers, whose work is based on logical reasoning, are caught in corruption while working ? Acknowledging the fact that ability of logical reasoning does not guarantee morality, even in engineering courses subjects like work ethics and moral values are included.
Secondly, the teaching of moral education could inspire students to aspire to devote their life as a social worker or activist. As we get acquainted with moral education ever since our childhood, we comprehend that anything we do will directly or indirectly affect people in the society. So, we tend to be an exemplary person that can give back to the society be it be in the form of doctors, engineers or accountant of a bank. Therefore, in order to aspire students to develop the qualities of empathy, kindness and love for any creature on Earth morality should be the foundation of education.
Lastly, morality also helps us to identify injustice and galvanizes you to speak against it. A veteran programmer might be able to code proficiently, but he might not be realizing how his or her might be abusing while working. Education does not guarantee the awareness about the morality among the students, but that is it's intended purpose. Therefore, it is often found social activist, politician who have studied moral education in their course standing ahead promptly against injustice.
In conclusion, logical reasoning ability could give us good earning, but morality teaches us the way of living by encouraging us to be kind, speak against injustice.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 58, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a systematic way" with adverb for "systematic"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...reasoning teaches solution of a problem in a systematic way based on evidences and facts. But in re...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 168, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... to code proficiently, but he might not be realizing how his or her might be abusing while w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, while, as to, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2155.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 431.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78662845381 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529002320186 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 699.3 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6160668283 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.722222222 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9444444444 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.21951772744 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263309823374 0.243740707755 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0851389779789 0.0831039109588 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452403878619 0.0758088955206 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149504675555 0.150359130593 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384446914853 0.0667264976115 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.