Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society.
As we live in a sophisticated and cosmopolitan world, with diverse moral principles and conventions, it is important to develop logical reasoning skill to question these conventions and orthodoxy. I agree with the prompt that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society rather than teaching morality as the foundation of the education. Follow are two reasons and a concession provided to support this thesis.
Firstly, teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would inculcate a habit of logically analysing the situation, and empirically taking a decision. This helps in developing a progressive character among the children, as they start question the orthodox nature of the society. This iconoclastic behaviour will in turn favour the dynamics of the society to push it in the direction of progress. For instance, dialectical materialism is concept put contributed by different philosophers, suggests that a perfect solution to a problem or an argument can drawn by having dialects based on material qualities of the world, which is the logic. Like, debating culture will enhance the working of an authority, as people will ask logical questions, instead of getting cajoled by moral principles, and consequently, augmenting the morality. Moreover, sometimes just morals principles does not get the work done. There's need to bend a few laws, which might work for the betterment of the society in broader picture. Therefore, it is important of logically analyse and, take decision for welfare of the people. Consequently, logical reasoning outcasts morality as the indispensable quality to have.
Secondly, moral principles are always subjective, and thus, might have a different opinions among different people. As a society, we want to eradicate the dogmas affecting the development and progress. A situation might have different opinions, like two sides of a same coin, and, it gets really tough to negotiate a common solution for a people of different views. For example, Homosexuality was considered a sin by the conventional religious people of different religions. Moreover, it was also considered to be disease by some orthodox section of the society. But, after support from scientific people have started logically analysing the situation, consequently Homosexuality is getting approved in many nations around the world. This example presents that sometimes morals and principle are not enough to judge a situations, as they remain hidebound. And, a logical reasoning provide a more versatile solution.
Thirdly, some people in some specific situation might argue that having a moral values is paramount to preserving one's culture and conventions. But, as we live in an eclectic world, different culture have different conventions, therefore, it important to have a common ground. And, logical reasoning justifying serves this purpose.
Conclusively, it is essential to inculcate logical reasoning among children, rather than just giving them the a lecture on morality, as it will help them question the orthodoxy, and pushing the society in forward direction.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 552, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[3]
Message: Did you mean 'draw' or 'be drawn'?
Suggestion: draw; be drawn
...olution to a problem or an argument can drawn by having dialects based on material qu...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 904, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: There's
... principles does not get the work done. Theres need to bend a few laws, which might wo...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1133, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'outcasts'' or 'outcast's'?
Suggestion: outcasts'; outcast's
...people. Consequently, logical reasoning outcasts morality as the indispensable quality t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 84, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'opinion'?
Suggestion: opinion
...ctive, and thus, might have a different opinions among different people. As a society, w...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 817, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a situation' or simply 'situations'?
Suggestion: a situation; situations
...s and principle are not enough to judge a situations, as they remain hidebound. And, a logic...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 115, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...moral values is paramount to preserving ones culture and conventions. But, as we liv...
^^^^
Line 9, column 107, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: the; a
... children, rather than just giving them the a lecture on morality, as it will help th...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, thus, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2646.0 2235.4752809 118% => OK
No of words: 479.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52400835073 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67825486995 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09545687854 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492693110647 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 846.0 704.065955056 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.7583976358 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.25 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9583333333 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95833333333 5.21951772744 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2834535232 0.243740707755 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827928042165 0.0831039109588 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111542064146 0.0758088955206 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169864267481 0.150359130593 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118534861885 0.0667264976115 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 48.8420337079 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.1639044944 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 100.480337079 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.