Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
When it comes to how to improve the quality of teaching and enhance the ability of faculty, there are many different suggestions. Some people claim that schools should requre teachers to work outside the academic world, while other argue that schools should let teachers focus on academic stuff. While I tend to agree with the former statement more, I do admit that both the two statements have their points.
Primarily, oftentimes teachers who have worked outside academic world know more about the trend in industries and would adjust their teaching to be more practical and up-to-date. To illustrate this, the new cloud computing professor, Steven Chan, in my university could be a good instance. Professor Chan has worked in Google for several years before coming to our university. Because of his special background, his lecture is very different from other professors. While most of the professors are very pedantic and always require students to master some trivial equations or theories, Professor Chan always introduce cutting-edge technologies to us. Later, my internship experience in Cisoc proves what Professor Chan taught us are far more useful than those other professors focus on. In this case, adopting the policy suggested by the statement certainly favors students much.
Although having some working experience may improve the teaching of faculty, we should not ignore that it will cost these teachers a lot of time and effort. Take these factors in to account, adopting the proposed policy may cause some disadvantages. If professors need to care about their work outside the academic world, they may not be able to fully devote themselves to the research and teaching. In this case, professors may have less office hours, and students will have less chance to interact and learn from professors in person.
In conclusion, it is a tade-off to require teachers to work outside academic worlds. While the special experience may make the lecture of these teachers more practical and less pedentic, it would take teachers a lot of effort to do so.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 103, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...hance the ability of faculty, there are many different suggestions. Some people claim that sch...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1739.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 335.0 442.535393258 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19104477612 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64288871706 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 215.323595506 85% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546268656716 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.065985166 60.3974514979 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.6875 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9375 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0625 5.21951772744 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130528656312 0.243740707755 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0477200858168 0.0831039109588 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495232235878 0.0758088955206 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0851137272 0.150359130593 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0159997811891 0.0667264976115 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 100.480337079 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.