Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Faculty members in colleges and universities continuously contemplate on what would be the best way to teach their students. To achieve this goal, some people claim that mandating professors to attain work experience in fields relevent to their teaching field will be optimal. On the other hand, some people assert that this is an unnecessary measure, and that the choice to work outside the academic world should be optional. I agree with the former position, in that this policy should be made a requirement.
Admittedly, giving more autonomy to professors on whether to gain more field experience could seem like the better choice, as they have enough maturity to decide what is best for them. Some majors taught in colleges may even be better off without the faculty losing their time on engaging in extracurricular activities, because they would learn more by doing experiments in school or studying academic journals. For example, in the case of english literature, if a professor's specific field of interest is literary history, diving into old classics and researching information about prominent historic authors would be more helpful than working at a publishing company. Meanwhile, a professor who teaches recent english literature trends would benefit from the aforementioned work experience, because he or she will be able to achieve data relevent to the field of interest hands-on.
However, making the policy optional can lead to more disadvantages than advantages. First of all, some professors could be reluctant to work in companies. To gain a position as a professor requires a person to go through years of ardous hard work and studies, and once people reach that goal, some could prefer to enjoy the prestigious position that they have earned. If there is an optional policy to gain more experience and for them to learn from people outside the academic field where they are not as omniscient as they are in school, they could refrain from these ventures because it could hurt their pride.
Also, professors should be pushed to learn new things in the working field for the benefit of the students they teach. People are liable to get complacent with the work that they do when they have been in that position for a long time. This can be an insidious poison for professors. For example, it is common to see MBA students complaining that the class material they're taught in school is outdated. Since gathering recent data and information in the field is difficult for professors because companies are cautious about their company strategies, class materials used in MBA courses are those that have already been revealed to the public or those that are obsolete to be useful. For professors who teach MBA courses, offering students with vital knowledge about the business world is a vital necessity, so they should be required to gain more experience in the working field.
In conclusion, the facultuy of colleges and universities should be enforced to take time working in companies outside the academic world. This will not only benefit their classes, but this will encourage them to not be complacent in their position.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 464, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a professor' or simply 'professors'?
Suggestion: a professor; professors
..., in the case of english literature, if a professors specific field of interest is literary ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 367, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they're
...nts complaining that the class material theyre taught in school is outdated. Since gat...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, while, for example, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 75.0 58.6224719101 128% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2640.0 2235.4752809 118% => OK
No of words: 517.0 442.535393258 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10638297872 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76839952204 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71835655172 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.462282398453 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 816.3 704.065955056 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.255248831 60.3974514979 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.0 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.85 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 5.21951772744 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214303736876 0.243740707755 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807436345352 0.0831039109588 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558705592701 0.0758088955206 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136866532529 0.150359130593 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230935168759 0.0667264976115 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 100.480337079 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.