Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach.
The topic raises a widely debated issue of professions outside the academic world. Indisputably, having a job within your area of expertise using the courses that an university taught is the best case scenario. This would help to form very specialized professional, increasing the work force level across a nation. Nevertheless, this reality is far form what we find nowadays and people should adapt to their enviroment. Thus, I disagree with the fact that faculties should require that students work in professions related to their courses.
First of all, there are numerous types of professions with different demanding for jobs, thus it is difficult to make such general claim to all possible scenarios. For example, people who are graduating from a law school probably will have a lot of job offers because it is a very hot market and people are always looking for this type of service. However, in most specific courses, such as nuclear engineering or astrophysics, graduated students might find a very hard time to find a profession related to their specialties. As a result, these people will start to seek jobs on other domains that could be not related to their courses or if they really want to be related with their professions, attain a doctoral degree on the academic world. Consequently, we should analyse individually each profession and course. In some cases the faculty could require such claim, but in most cases it could be very challenging for students to follow this rule.
Secondly, people should be free to choose what they want and no institution should interfere in they freedom. Requiring that all students might undertake they jobs related to they courses could provoke depressive and frustrated workers . It is not difficult to find someone that work on a job that is far from being related to his/her course, but he/she are very satisfied. For instance, banks are always looking for new graduate students from engineering courses. Even though there are almost no relation between the courses taught in these two professions, the students are able to perform very well on the money’s field. In addition, a lot of people discover their passion with economy and are very pleased for the opportunity to discover it. Under those lines, the profession path that each person follows should be chosen by themselves and the university should not participate in that decision.
Admittedly, working on the same field of study would help to create very specialized professionals. However, the argument above does not constitute a sufficient support to the claim that in most cases this is not possible due to factors including available jobs places or the individual motivations and professional goals.
In sum, although creating a rule that is mandatory to students find jobs related to their taught courses on university could help to increase the quality of work force, they also tend to veer off in irrelevant directions. As long as people are satisfied with their professions, no one should try change this reality. In fact, the individual quality of life should be in first place and faculties might work to improve that instead of creating unfeasible rules that in the real word no one will be able to follow.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 164, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...rea of expertise using the courses that an university taught is the best case scen...
^^
Line 1, column 430, Rule ID: AGREE_WITH_THE_FACT[1]
Message: Use simply 'disagree that'.
Suggestion: disagree that
...ould adapt to their enviroment. Thus, I disagree with the fact that faculties should require that students ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 160, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'job'
Suggestion: job
... that all students might undertake they jobs related to they courses could provoke d...
^^^^
Line 5, column 181, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'course'
Suggestion: course
...ght undertake they jobs related to they courses could provoke depressive and frustrated...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 236, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...rovoke depressive and frustrated workers . It is not difficult to find someone tha...
^^
Line 5, column 355, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...g related to his/her course, but he/she are very satisfied. For instance, banks are...
^^^
Line 7, column 272, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ctors including available jobs places or the individual motivations and professio...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, look, nevertheless, really, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in fact, such as, as a result, first of all, in most cases, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 33.0505617978 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2711.0 2235.4752809 121% => OK
No of words: 535.0 442.535393258 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06728971963 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80937282943 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76988283487 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 215.323595506 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480373831776 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 831.6 704.065955056 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7489954054 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.869565217 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2608695652 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5652173913 5.21951772744 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232555705588 0.243740707755 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0732834306782 0.0831039109588 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604341137102 0.0758088955206 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137218120709 0.150359130593 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0686406813093 0.0667264976115 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 100.480337079 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.