Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Cars are a very important part of our lives. It is the way we use to travel from some place to another. Some people would believe that in twenty years there will be more cars in use than there are today; others would disagree. In my view, in the next two decades there will be fewer cars for two important reasons.
The main reason is that the technology is advancing. Every day we see on television news about innovative products that are entering in the market and alternatives for cars is not an exception. Vehicles are very dangerous for the environment because they release in the air a lot of substances, such as fumes and carbon dioxide, that destroy the atmospherical ozone layer and increase the greenhouse effect. For example, last week, I was watching on YouTube a presentation of a new drone capable of transporting up to three people. The company that made this product was placed in China and was called Ehang. The sales were planned to start in 2022 and they already have a lot of countries interested in using it for military purposes. The drone can perform a two hours trip without stop and could reach a maximum range of two hundred kilometers. The price for the costumer will be about fifty thousand dollar, not so far from actual cars on the market. Also, the man that was presenting told that a new version is expected to be on the market on the next ten years and will be able to reach five hundred kilometers in just three yours and will be fully electrical powered. This drone clearly demonstrated that in twenty years more alternatives to classical cars will be available on the market.
Another reason is that cities are becoming no more viable to cars. A common issue for almost all major cities on Earth, like New York, Tokyo, Paris, and Rio, is that the traffic of vehicles is increasing dramatically. In addition, there is not more place for the construction of new roads due to the structure of the cities. In that way, alternatives for cars is mandatory. For instance, I'm taking my TOEFL exam on Sao Paulo, the biggest city in Brazil. I booked the closest hotel from the test center that I found on internet and it is located about six blocks from here. This morning, I called a taxi to go to the exam and it took incredible forty five minutes to cover six hundred meters. Because of the rush hours, the city's traffic was completely crowded, also there was an accident that increase even more the traffic jam. The taxi driver told me that this happens almost every day and he was considering change his job because he is starting to lose a lot of money staying freeze on the streets. He also explained to me that on last year the streets were much better then now and there will a time, very soon, that the city will stop completely. This experience tought me that the number of cars will need to decrease in twenty years.
In sum, though may some believe that the quantity of cars in the next twenty years will be greater than now, in fact, from my experience, I believe that they will decrease. Not only new alternatives are appearing everyday but also cities are starting to stop due to the large number of vehicles using their streets. Everyone should try to use more alternatives to cars, such as public transportation or bicycles, to see all the benefits that less cars could have in our lives.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 63, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...ant part of our lives. It is the way we use to travel from some place to another. S...
^^^
Line 3, column 737, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...sted in using it for military purposes. The drone can perform a two hours trip with...
^^^
Line 3, column 848, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...aximum range of two hundred kilometers. The price for the costumer will be about fi...
^^^
Line 5, column 389, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...es for cars is mandatory. For instance, Im taking my TOEFL exam on Sao Paulo, the ...
^^
Line 5, column 1068, Rule ID: COMPARISONS_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'better than'?
Suggestion: better than
...that on last year the streets were much better then now and there will a time, very soon, t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1075, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... last year the streets were much better then now and there will a time, very soon, t...
^^^^
Line 7, column 200, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ill decrease. Not only new alternatives are appearing everyday but also cities are starting t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 214, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...Not only new alternatives are appearing everyday but also cities are starting to stop du...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 443, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun cars is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... bicycles, to see all the benefits that less cars could have in our lives.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, then, for example, for instance, in addition, in fact, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 36.0 15.1003584229 238% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2742.0 1977.66487455 139% => OK
No of words: 600.0 407.700716846 147% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.94923200384 4.48103885553 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48679847729 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 282.0 212.727598566 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 865.8 618.680645161 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0982487555 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9285714286 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.45110844103 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188051197261 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0527281424056 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638856914629 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142857607293 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619093336679 0.0645574589148 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.