Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the posit

Essay topics:

Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach.

Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.

Colleges and university's mission is to provide students advanced knowledge and prepare for their future career. Therefore, to achieve the goal, I think that faculty members should have experience working off campus in a relevant professional environment in order to be qualified to teach their courses.

Faculties who have gained work experience tend to teach their courses better. Since they worked in a professional team, they tend to think problems with logic and structure. When teaching courses, they will implement this way of thinking in the class and teach students to solve problem more efficiently thus improves students skills. Also, when teaching classes they will use a more practical tone to introduce a topic. While physics and mathematics can sometimes be abstract, a faculty with practical experience can give a clearer explanation to students, thus improve their studies.

Moreover, after students graduate, most of them will find jobs out of the academic world. If the university faculties had worked outside campus. They can provide information about different companies culture and guide them to find their dream job. Also, faculties can even recommend their students to the company they worked before. Providing young talented graduates to work for the company. Not only students are able to secure job positions, companies can also get young guns to join them.

However, some faculties whose research topic is highly sophisticated such as fusion technology or biotech cannot find relevant professions in the job market. They stayed in the academic field in their whole life and devote their talent to their research. Therefore requiring those faculties to spend time working off-campus is a waste of their time and it will encumber their research progress. They already have enough experience and skills be qualified to teach in relevant courses and provide students knowledge.

Faculties who have work experience can definitely benefit on the performance in teaching courses and their students. However, there are also faculties who dictated their lives on essential research. Therefore we should encourage them to have work experience but should not require them to do so.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 91, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ll find jobs out of the academic world. If the university faculties had worked out...
^^
Line 13, column 256, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... devote their talent to their research. Therefore requiring those faculties to spend time...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 200, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ated their lives on essential research. Therefore we should encourage them to have work e...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, i think, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1875.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 343.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46647230321 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69762653575 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545189504373 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.4825309131 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.75 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.15 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20886752869 0.243740707755 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0774899753568 0.0831039109588 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431871235552 0.0758088955206 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130673608564 0.150359130593 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0176931617917 0.0667264976115 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.15 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.