colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach.
The claim suggests that all faculty should be required to spend time outside the academic work. Apparently, it aims to force the professors to step outside the campus for a bit and keep them from do the research in their lab without getting in touch with the outside world. I find this appeal practical and meaningful, and I will explain my reasons as follows.
For starters, faculty having some practical experiences could help them have a better understanding of the knowledge they are teaching. I think we can all agree on that colleges and universities are not only paradise of academic researches but also a fuel station helping people have a greater career achievement. Thus, it is imperative for the professors to be aware of how can the professional knowledge be used in the real world. Without real life experiences, chances are that professors, being unfamiliar with the usage of his professional knowledge, would put lots of focus on recent academic progress in class and ignore the need of instruction on how to practice.And his students will probably find themselves hard to perform the knowledge later on doing their job.
Secondly, working outside the lab could help professor be aware of the applied technic presently, and adjust his emphasis in his research accordingly. While it is true that one could learn about the hot topic by viewing the magazines, the real life experience could give a better guide. And it is always the need that encourage people to dig deeper. Consider the phones that we use everyday. New technic are being invented everyday to make the phone have a better performance, and locking oneself in a lab could miss the progress that commercial companies have made in the field.
Some may argue that spare effort on things outside academic world is a waste of energy. Plausible as it may sound, I think it only serves to have the classes more functional, and is not a bad thing for students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 672, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: And
... need of instruction on how to practice.And his students will probably find themsel...
^^^
Line 9, column 383, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...deeper. Consider the phones that we use everyday. New technic are being invented everyda...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 424, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...veryday. New technic are being invented everyday to make the phone have a better perform...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...s have made in the field. Some may argue that spare effort on things outside aca...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, while, i think, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1616.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 329.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91185410334 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73126985079 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550151975684 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 704.065955056 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.3801992678 60.3974514979 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.428571429 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 5.21951772744 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185921763838 0.243740707755 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691368100752 0.0831039109588 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118872920721 0.0758088955206 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118309252459 0.150359130593 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0931163694727 0.0667264976115 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.