Colleges and universities should require students to spend at least one semester studying in a foreign country
The author contends that students enrolled in colleges and universities ought to spend at least a semester at a different country. However, the following essay will argue that it is plausible to disagree with the author's statement.
Admittingly, there exist benefits of studying abroad. By taking classes at a different nation, a student is able to communicate with students with various nationalities. This is a way for students to widen their perspective effectively by actually having to talk with them and not solely just a casual talk that one can have from traveling, but even the serious kind of conversation about one's major can be done. Therefore, it can widen one's knowledge spectrum but also can strengthen their ability to fraternalize with the first-met people easily. Moreover, these skills are important since the students in universities are the one to lead the country in the future. By acknowledging the differences among different nation, the terrorism act, which harassment toward different races is done recklessly, could be decreased in the future.
However, we have to keep in mind that students are the one who is impressionable easily. When a student goes to another country, experience and beholds first-seen activities, one has a chance and willing to experience those acts. The reason why this is nefarious is because there should be a socially admitted ambiance of why the first seen act is not allowed and suited in one's country. For example, in Korea, many students have a chance to go to the States for a study abroad program. However, once they go to the States where drugs are more easy to get, even with some of the states allowing drug consumption, they have a chance to do drugs. Since the addictive source of the drugs remain in one's body, one will be willing to consume one even when they come to Korea where it is prohibited harshly. In addition, students regard studying abroad mostly as a chance to relax one self and travel different country. It is a waste of the country's intelligent students. If they did not go abroad and stayed in one's country, they could have prepared oneself more to get into a government sector or a conglomerate and could strengthen the nation power.
Moreover, our degree of technology improves exponentially daily. Up until now, our communication technology allowed students to communicate with different country's students immediately and to a profound number of other students and even the most prestigious professor in one's major simultaneously through Internet and mobile phones. This is not done through just studying abroad. This allows students to share ideas with more various nationality of students instantly that could have not been met through studying abroad programs.
In summary, I believe that colleges and universities do not have to make student to spend a semester abroad for a requirement in order to graduate. There definitely is a pro for this but the cons outweighs the positive sides for studying abroad.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Sentence: If they did not go abroad and stayed in one's country, they could have prepared oneself more to get into a government sector or a conglomerate and could strengthen the nation power.
Description: The token a is not usually followed by a verb, base: uninflected present, imperative or infinitive
Suggestion: Refer to a and conglomerate
Sentence: Therefore, it can widen one's knowledge spectrum but also can strengthen their ability to fraternalize with the first-met people easily.
Error: fraternalize Suggestion: No alternate word
flaws:
No. of Words: 494 while No. of Different Words: 237
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 23 15
No. of Words: 494 350
No. of Characters: 2463 1500
No. of Different Words: 237 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.714 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.986 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.806 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 182 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 137 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 103 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 60 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.478 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.207 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.609 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.302 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.498 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.098 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 214, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...at it is plausible to disagree with the authors statement. Admittingly, there exist...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 438, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...or can be done. Therefore, it can widen ones knowledge spectrum but also can strengt...
^^^^
Line 5, column 375, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...t seen act is not allowed and suited in ones country. For example, in Korea, many st...
^^^^
Line 5, column 568, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...e drugs are more easy to get, even with some of the states allowing drug consumption, they ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 696, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...addictive source of the drugs remain in ones body, one will be willing to consume on...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1007, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...If they did not go abroad and stayed in ones country, they could have prepared onese...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'at least', 'for example', 'in addition', 'in summary', 'kind of']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.212962962963 0.240241500013 89% => OK
Verbs: 0.17037037037 0.157235817809 108% => OK
Adjectives: 0.062962962963 0.0880659088768 71% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0907407407407 0.0497285424764 182% => Less adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.0314814814815 0.0444667217837 71% => OK
Prepositions: 0.114814814815 0.12292977631 93% => OK
Participles: 0.0462962962963 0.0406280797675 114% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.87744901419 2.79330140395 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0462962962963 0.030933414821 150% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.101851851852 0.0997080785238 102% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0222222222222 0.0249443105267 89% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0148148148148 0.0148568991511 100% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3010.0 2732.02544248 110% => OK
No of words: 494.0 452.878318584 109% => OK
Chars per words: 6.09311740891 6.0361032391 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71445763274 4.58838876751 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.376518218623 0.366273622748 103% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.297570850202 0.280924506359 106% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.230769230769 0.200843997647 115% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.12955465587 0.132149295362 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87744901419 2.79330140395 103% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 219.290929204 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47975708502 0.48968727796 98% => OK
Word variations: 55.4229262341 55.4138127331 100% => OK
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6194690265 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.4782608696 23.380412469 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0900670153 59.4972553346 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.869565217 141.124799967 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4782608696 23.380412469 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.652173913043 0.674092028746 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.21349557522 115% => OK
Readability: 51.2353458898 51.4728631049 100% => OK
Elegance: 1.27848101266 1.64882698954 78% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310499075235 0.391690518653 79% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.110717684644 0.123202303941 90% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0940101942716 0.077325440228 122% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.49174807323 0.547984918172 90% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.14891770151 0.149214159877 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119081784491 0.161403998019 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105755618897 0.0892212321368 119% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.351112686358 0.385218514788 91% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0965510972677 0.0692045440612 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220578821628 0.275328986314 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541338707711 0.0653680567796 83% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.4325221239 153% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.30420353982 38% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88274336283 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 16.0 7.22455752212 221% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.70907079646 185% => OK
Total topic words: 23.0 13.5995575221 169% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.