Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Internet as it have bring the whole world in the individual hand, from which anyone can contact and search anything is flick of a seconds. It has also create security as a big issue and threat to individuals. Today any hacker can track anyone emails and can do all the bad things easily. Since world have shown concerned over the privacy of the user, a great deal of work has been done for the individual security. Email are one of the most used contacting service in today`s industry, and people use emails for delivering their messages or sending invitation or contacting their customers and for many more reasons. A company primary policy should be to maintain their employee privacy and create atmosphere of trust and harmony.
Tracking and monitoring employee email is an unethical act any company would do. Since user privacy is the highest concerned, monitoring employee emails is against the law and can a company can be prosecuted if found guilty. Employee many times do personal emails to their loved ones or to there social circle which they don`t want to share and want to keep it as private as possible. In this case monitoring someone email is unethical act because it is done without the employee consent. Consider a real life example of a television channel where the news caster gets information from there hidden resources in this case if company monitors employee emails, people might losses trust in the company and in sometime people will stop providing them internal information in fear that they might get exposed. This can really damage the company business and can even have a harmful impact.
Since if company monitor employee email it will be against their consent so employee will automatically loses the trust they have in the company. It will create an environment where people will think that their other things might also be monitored. If employee starts to lose trust in the company he might will think of switching of to another company where his privacy is being preserved, and gradually people will start leaving the company. Consider the news channel example above, if a reporter source that provide him internal news gets exposed the reporter will immediately leave the company as he don`t want to lose his other resources and will go the news channel that provides him privacy for contacting someone.
In some cases it might be right act to monitor the emails. Company should made a system where if an employee sends a threatening email to someone from there office, that email should be monitored and agencies should be informed about it before anything bad happens. This monitoring should only be done in case if a threatening email is being made and not otherwise. Like this employee privacy is being maintained and company is safe from any issue or lawsuit that they might face if any crime is being committed using their resources. Like if an employee had an argument with someone and he threatens other person on his life, in this case police should be informed that a threatening email is being sent from there office and they should do an investigation upon it.
Company primary policy should be to maintain employee privacy. An environment of trust should be maintained among the employees and no act or policy be made which makes employee question their privacy or their daily routine work. People don`t like their private matter and even a chat among two employees to be exposed to someone else without their consent on it. SO efforts should be made for employee to be more comfortable rather then being in doubts.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 21, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'brought'.
Suggestion: brought
Internet as it have bring the whole world in the individual hand,...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 129, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a second' or simply 'seconds'?
Suggestion: a second; seconds
...contact and search anything is flick of a seconds. It has also create security as a big i...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 152, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'created'.
Suggestion: created
...hing is flick of a seconds. It has also create security as a big issue and threat to i...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 423, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'emails'.
Suggestion: emails
...ssible. In this case monitoring someone email is unethical act because it is done wit...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 105, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'lose'
Suggestion: lose
... consent so employee will automatically loses the trust they have in the company. It ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 439, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'? 'than' is used for comparisons, 'then' is an expression of time.
Suggestion: than
... employee to be more comfortable rather then being in doubts.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, really, second, so, then, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 35.0 19.5258426966 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 33.0 12.4196629213 266% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 27.0 14.8657303371 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2990.0 2235.4752809 134% => OK
No of words: 607.0 442.535393258 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92586490939 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.96360453597 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50694910697 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.405271828666 0.4932671777 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 946.8 704.065955056 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.3356796905 60.3974514979 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.6 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.28 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.96 5.21951772744 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197402774251 0.243740707755 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745098902506 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506108497133 0.0758088955206 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126260653363 0.150359130593 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492108049264 0.0667264976115 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.