Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits.
The author propounds the recommendation to regualarly monitor the employee mails in order to reduce not only wastage of time but also protect the company against lawsuits. Although this recommendation might seem viable and helpful for a company manager who is solely worried about the security and efficiency of company but the same recommendation will certainly seem absurd to a person who considers the privacy of individual employees as important as the company itself.
First of all, such monitoring can have adverse affects on the relationships between the company mangement and the employees. This may create unfavourable working atmosphere for employees and this can reduce the alacrity and diligence with which employees work. This move will make employees feel allienated from the company and may no longer feel the sense of belonging to the company. In the worst case scenario the employees may feel the need to leave the company and move to the companies with better working environment and treat their employee privacy and rights as important as the company itself.
Secondly, the recommendation aims at saving resource wastage probably by the assumption that the employees would not sent unimportant mails knowing that they are being monitored. This would save time wastage by employees in wasteful correspondence and increase their efficiency. This will also reduce the burden on the company server as assumedly less number pf mails will be exchanged. But the problem with the assumption is that it does it does not consider the possibility of employees conversing using e-mail ID unknown to company management. They may use this e-mail Id on their personal devices which do not use the company server. So, even if do not consider the privacy aspect of employees, the recommendation may fail to fulfil its objectives as such because employees may find a way to circumvent the company monitoring.
Although in some conditions it might seem important to monitor employee correspondence when there is some suspicion of time wastage by employees or even reports of some employees machinating against the company. But in such cases only the employees which are the possible defaulters should be monitored and not all of the employees. Also there can be other ways to reduce resource wastage such as timely completion of work by employee.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es as important as the company itself. First of all, such monitoring can have a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 192, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eate unfavourable working atmosphere for employees and this can reduce the alacri...
^^
Line 3, column 118, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'send'
Suggestion: send
...assumption that the employees would not sent unimportant mails knowing that they are...
^^^^
Line 3, column 348, Rule ID: LESS_COMPARATIVE[1]
Message: Non-standard use of the comparative or superlative. Did you mean 'less numb'?
Suggestion: less numb
...rden on the company server as assumedly less number pf mails will be exchanged. But the pro...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 432, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'it does'.
Suggestion: it does
...the problem with the assumption is that it does it does not consider the possibility of employe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 443, Rule ID: DOES_NP_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'do'?
Suggestion: do
... with the assumption is that it does it does not consider the possibility of employe...
^^^^
Line 3, column 443, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'do'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: do
... with the assumption is that it does it does not consider the possibility of employe...
^^^^
Line 3, column 573, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'd
...ny management. They may use this e-mail Id on their personal devices which do not ...
^^
Line 4, column 311, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... defaulters should be monitored and not all of the employees. Also there can be other ways...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 333, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...monitored and not all of the employees. Also there can be other ways to reduce resou...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1973.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 377.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23342175066 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89340439769 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.466843501326 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 613.8 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.470913299 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.533333333 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1333333333 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367755408873 0.243740707755 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136418464942 0.0831039109588 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061914328336 0.0758088955206 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234640930676 0.150359130593 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0198735652633 0.0667264976115 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.