Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits.
It's an argument regarding monitoring of activities from employees. E-mails are something most widely used item common across the industries for both internal and external communication. Monitoring of e-mails will definitively have benefits like better resource management and more control on curbing legal issues.
Any employee if monitor his or her personal e-email database will have majority of previous e-mails which are of no use currently and still eating up huge memory in database for storing them. Earlier when we started communication on e-mails number of users and their communications were limited but now everything being handled and transmitted online, there is plethora of data which is mostly irrelevant which should be managed as it will free up system resources for better resources, prevent slowing of databases and also can help financially by preventing company for paying for irrelevant database memory.
Well along with irrelevancy of e-mails, we have another issue which can be curbed by regular monitoring of employees activities is the legal protection. As the competitions among the latest tech is getting aggressive among the companies across the sectors, there are many guidelines and rules established to maintain the fairness of this competition and unbiased platform for the deserving company to lead in their domain. Failing to comply this complex set of rules can cost company various lawsuits and eventually huge financial penalties irrespective of the extent of inadvertent mistake by any employee. So if company regularly monitors the content of their employee's emails or at least for the ones with suspicious correspondence it can be very helpful to avoid many legal actions just happened because of any employee being new or irresponsible in his job or in complying with instructions listed to avoid any such scenario. Also we can't forget to mention fishing activities which are extensively used bytrade frauds and hackers to deceive employees to provide confidential data out in the wrong hands which they can use for their benefit and can be highly damaging to the functioning or reputation of that company.
So monitoring as explained above can really help in various financial, performance and legal scenarios at th expense of lit
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
Its an argument regarding monitoring of act...
^^^
Line 3, column 931, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ions listed to avoid any such scenario. Also we cant forget to mention fishing activ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 939, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ted to avoid any such scenario. Also we cant forget to mention fishing activities wh...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1015, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ities which are extensively used bytrade frauds and hackers to deceive employees ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, really, regarding, so, still, well, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1920.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 357.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3781512605 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93457442294 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596638655462 0.4932671777 121% => OK
syllable_count: 617.4 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 23.0359550562 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 101.663762773 60.3974514979 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 174.545454545 118.986275619 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.4545454545 23.4991977007 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36363636364 5.21951772744 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198920688121 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793307080496 0.0831039109588 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427746236126 0.0758088955206 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117266967767 0.150359130593 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430633055603 0.0667264976115 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.1 14.1392134831 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.54 48.8420337079 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 12.1743820225 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.52 12.1639044944 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.62 8.38706741573 127% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 100.480337079 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.2143820225 132% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.