Creativity should be used as the only true measure of intelligence
Great world achievements have been made by men of great creativity and such men are revered for their high level of intelligence. As a matter of fact, it is perhaps easily defined that creativity and intelligence are intertwined. The prompt suggests that to admit that someone is intelligent, their creativity should be only factor to consider. This position is rather quite rigid and I strongly disagree for two reasons.
To start, creativity is based on external judgement and principles that govern a particular field. Thus, there is slikelihood for misjudgment or misperception of a nascent idea form someone who comes up with an idea that probably defies existing rules. For instance, in the field of Geography, it was initially believed that the earth was flat but some scientist propounded theories contrary to this believe and syatem, but were met with criticisms and their positions were initially unaccepted. Thus, they would be, at that point, be painted as not intelligent observers because their theories, supposedly, did not portray any form of creativity. So, creativity , being largely dependent on perceptions and outside judgement can in most times be inaccurate and misleading, thus, wrongly asserting that one is not intelligent.
Furthermore, an intelligent individual may still need some time to showcase their creativity. That a fresh graduate cannot discuss a topic just as a professor in that field would does not simply create a stamping order that such a student is not intelligent. It would definitely take him some more time, for learning and studying, for him to deliver a creative concept and idea—meaning that such student had been intelligent, though not creative for being yet nascent in the field. Thus, it can be righly posited that intelligence can be innate and would ultimately give expression to someone’s creative abilities. History supported this idea in the case of Albert Einsten—known to have failed in several class subjects, wrongly perceived by some as unintelligent, by that measure. However, with time, his future exploits later vindicated him to be a highly intelligent person who only needed the right time and environment to deliver. As such, to quickly jump to conclusion that because someone cannot show a creative idea or object linked to them then they are not intelligent is purely immature and disservice to humanity.
Of course some may argue that creativity definitely shows someone is intelligent—this is however not what the argument posits. Yes, if someone can come up eith a creative idea, of course, such one is clearly intelligent. But to use that as the only measure of intelligence will be wrong position to assume.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 401, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'belief' (noun) instead of believe (verb)?
Suggestion: belief
...st propounded theories contrary to this believe and syatem, but were met with criticism...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 663, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...y any form of creativity. So, creativity , being largely dependent on perceptions ...
^^
Line 9, column 180, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'do'
Suggestion: do
...just as a professor in that field would does not simply create a stamping order that...
^^^^
Line 13, column 308, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gence will be wrong position to assume.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, then, thus, for instance, of course, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2284.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 432.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28703703704 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06968980231 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539351851852 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 718.2 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3336660137 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.210526316 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7368421053 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42105263158 5.21951772744 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299876133643 0.243740707755 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100528557528 0.0831039109588 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10285353412 0.0758088955206 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203787010077 0.150359130593 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0631554682069 0.0667264976115 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 100.480337079 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.