If two applicants for a job are otherwise equally qualified, the job should
go to the applicant with more experience.
Sustainability of any company or institution depends on the quality of its employees, and recruitment process into such entity should be well monitored to absorb the best candiates it could get for that time. The prompt suggests that applicants with more experience should be given prority during recruitment processs. I strongly disagree with the position of making recruitment decisions be based on years of experience for two reasons.
To start with, the recruitment panel should be aware that performance and interest of employees diminish with time. It is purely a natural process supported by ‘the law of diminishing returns”. Research has demonstrated this that passion of workforce for personal development and zeal for on-the-job performance wane with time. Meanwhile, a qualified “fresh blood” is full of passion to want to deliver on the job and to carve a niche for himself in an industry that employes him. To undermine such a candidate full of potentials for an “waning”, probably apathetic, candidate who, for unknown reasons, left a former workplace would be a high disservice to that company.
Furthermore, the future of a company should be a priority to the recruitment panel, and must be mindful to employ for futuristic needs rather than being myopic about their decisions. For instance, a qualified, young graduate definitely has more years to stay in service than a candidate who has worked for a number of years at other places. It is important to know that fair opportunities shoud be accorded to all candidates irrespective of their previous experiences
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 468, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...respective of their previous experiences
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, well, while, for instance, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1368.0 2235.4752809 61% => OK
No of words: 254.0 442.535393258 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38582677165 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23238896123 2.79657885939 116% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 215.323595506 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602362204724 0.4932671777 122% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 704.065955056 60% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5147353969 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.363636364 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0909090909 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54545454545 5.21951772744 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188319705906 0.243740707755 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0740388610493 0.0831039109588 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588314656883 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116924633125 0.150359130593 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304126199363 0.0667264976115 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.38706741573 116% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.