Creativity should be used as the only true measure of intelligence.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The statement of the author that the Creativity is the only measure of intelligence sounds biased. As we know that intelligence is something which can’t be easily defined. It is a word which comprise of lot many things in it such as logic, understanding, self-awareness, learning, emotional knowledge, reasoning, planning, problem-solving and creativity. Here, one question arises that how the author came on the conclusion that the only true measure of intelligence is creativity. It looks like he was ignorant while putting up this claim and made statement without taking everything in consideration.
Further, another question arises that what type of intelligence we are measuring. If, we are measuring an ability of an engineer in JEE exam or a doctor’s ability in NEET exam we will not measure their level of creativity while we will surely measure their quantitative, scientific and logical reasoning. The examiners will certainly not mark them on their cursive writing in these exams as a measure of creativity but on their ability to solve the reasoning problems. Moreover, we can see that in the name of creativity we cannot change the mathematical, scientific and universal facts. Hence, it can’t be the only measure of intelligence.
Creativity can be the source of arts but while doing experiment in science we cannot use creativity by changing the mixture of chemicals which can lead to dangerous results. The creativity of scientists who created nuclear and atom bomb was not a measure of intelligence but the worst measure of destruction. As well as, creativity shown in the movies like Terminator where scientists took creativity too far by creating such robots who tried to overpower humans and take control of earth. These are some of the dangerous and foolish examples of creativity (which can also be seen in future and need to be beware of it). Besides, creativity cannot work in the situation when a shooter is asked to shoot on a definite target then he can’t do it creatively in Bollywood style where hero shoot at the rod and the bullet gets diverted from it and perfectly hits on the villain who is hidden.
However, creativity is the soul of today’s tech market where without everyday innovation no company can survive. For example, when Apple launches iphone 6 then Samsung, oneplus and xiaomi needs to show their creativity as well then only they can dispose off their products in market and remain in this competitive scenario. As well as creativity seen in a child can be good for its mental development. It opens up one’s mind and person begins to think widely. Creativity is like an angel for specially -abled because of which they can walk on their legs and eat with their hands by their prosthetic legs and hands developed by some creative person.
Yet, we can understand from the above examination that not only creativity but knowledge, expertise, observation, flexibility, thought process, practice and experience together makes a person intelligent. With all these characteristics present together in a person, he gets the ability to create something but that creation will be constructive for the civilizations and not destructive as shown in the examples above.
Finally, the conclusion is measure of intelligence should be the ability to apply it during the time of problem and respond in a best way possible to solve them. Intelligence is complicated, difficult to define and nearly impossible to measure concept that nonetheless exists in everyone to some degree or another. Hence, measuring it only on the degree of creativity sounds unwise and seems incomplete when we measure the intelligence of a person. As we know that, we can call a mathematician intelligent but we can’t laud an artist with the word intelligent instead we can praise him with words like creative, inspirational and so on. So, it seems that every measure has its own scope and it can’t take over another measure which is needed to be understood by the author.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 197, Rule ID: COMPRISE_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprise' or 'consist of'?
Suggestion: comprise; consist of
...t be easily defined. It is a word which comprise of lot many things in it such as logic, un...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 501, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ns and take control of earth. These are some of the dangerous and foolish examples of creat...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 233, Rule ID: AS_ADJ_AS[1]
Message: Comparison is written "as well 'as'".
Suggestion: as
... needs to show their creativity as well then only they can dispose off their product...
^^^^
Line 11, column 128, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...ring the time of problem and respond in a best way possible to solve them. Intell...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, hence, however, if, look, moreover, nonetheless, so, then, well, while, for example, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 25.0 12.4196629213 201% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 30.0 14.8657303371 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 26.0 11.3162921348 230% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 61.0 33.0505617978 185% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 92.0 58.6224719101 157% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3376.0 2235.4752809 151% => OK
No of words: 658.0 442.535393258 149% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13069908815 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.06473204393 4.55969084622 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04369772812 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 311.0 215.323595506 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.4726443769 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 1085.4 704.065955056 154% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0787390367 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.037037037 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3703703704 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92592592593 5.21951772744 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 22.0 10.2758426966 214% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196330622024 0.243740707755 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0675806061968 0.0831039109588 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493274119744 0.0758088955206 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112204300797 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286736266782 0.0667264976115 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 138.0 100.480337079 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.