Cot-Ten, a cotton production company, has recently faced profitability issues based on the use ofChemical X in its manufacturing process. The main by-product produced when using Chemical X iscovered under stringent environmental regulations, making it ver

Essay topics:

Cot-Ten, a cotton production company, has recently faced profitability issues based on the use of
Chemical X in its manufacturing process. The main by-product produced when using Chemical X is
covered under stringent environmental regulations, making it very difficult and expensive to dispose of. A
similar processing product, Chemical Y, has recently been discovered, and can be used by Cot-Ten at a
minimal cost of switching. The CEO of Cot-Ten has declared that the company will increase profits by
switching to Chemical Y by the end of the month.

Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and
explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.

In the statement, the CEO of Cot-Ten declared that the company will increase its profits by switching to Chemical Y from Chemical X by the end of the month. Here, the question arises on what basis the CEO declares that profit will be increased as no such clear information has been provided. Additionally, in the statement there is no mention that Chemical Y is not having any environmental regulations on it. So, directly reaching to the conclusion of switching to Chemical Y to increase profits of the company being with lack of information is hard to consider.

Secondly, another question to the statement is whether the product made by using this new chemical Y had been reviewed or not and also the statement made by the CEO is on the basis of discovery or on the basis of product manufactured by new Chemical Y. Further, the question is whether the same product can be manufactured with the new Chemical Y as it was manufactured with Chemical X. And what is the probability that the product manufactured with new Chemical Y will not be costly and in that case it will be brought by only a number of customers. As a consequence, it seems that the profit of the company will not increase as early as stated by the CEO of the company.

In addition to it, again the query arises if the manufacturing unit of Cot-Ten is familiar with this new Chemical Y or they need to be trained that how to use the new chemical carefully increasing the time of manufacturing the product, as a result the increase in profits of the company cannot be seen as early as the CEO suggested.

Furthermore, the conclusion given in the argument that this switch of Chemical X to Chemical Y will increase the profit of the company but what if the switch to Chemical Y causes revenue to fall? The author also states that Chemical Y is the “similar processing product” but the cotton produced by it will be as better as earlier one. Will the customers accept this switch and will purchase the new product or what if the customers deny the product causing fall in the revenue of the company.

Besides, what will happen to the stock already been prepared and how it will be disposed off? If it cannot be disposed from now, than with this kind of huge loss how CEO can declare the increase in profit by the end of the month.
While, on the other hand if the statement proves to be true than it will certainly be beneficial for the company. Increasing the profit of the company as well as removing the bar of environmental regulation from it giving it the chance to thrive again. In that case CEO’s decision will be highly appreciated and company will regain its image in the market among the investors and the customers.

Finally in the conclusion, it can be said that switching of the new Chemical Y seems too early with this little information as provided by the author. And CEO and the company need to look towards broader and future aspects of this decision to actualize the decision in a more profitable way for the company.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 330, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...cotton produced by it will be as better as earlier one. Will the customers accept ...
^^
Line 9, column 130, Rule ID: COMMA_THAN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'then'?
Suggestion: then
...off? If it cannot be disposed from now, than with this kind of huge loss how CEO can...
^^^^
Line 12, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...ong the investors and the customers. Finally in the conclusion, it can be said that ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, furthermore, if, look, second, secondly, so, well, while, in addition, kind of, as a result, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.6327345309 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.9520958084 162% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 11.1786427146 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 28.8173652695 115% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 55.5748502994 139% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 16.3942115768 98% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2501.0 2260.96107784 111% => OK
No of words: 540.0 441.139720559 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63148148148 5.12650576532 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82057051367 4.56307096286 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75408351263 2.78398813304 99% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 204.123752495 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.359259259259 0.468620217663 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 792.9 705.55239521 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 19.7664670659 96% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.8473053892 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.4518510245 57.8364921388 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.631578947 119.503703932 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4210526316 23.324526521 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.94736842105 5.70786347227 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 5.15768463074 136% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.20758483034 183% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 6.88822355289 15% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194562952259 0.218282227539 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765448955636 0.0743258471296 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551826747472 0.0701772020484 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109553159023 0.128457276422 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0676069508343 0.0628817314937 108% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.3799401198 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 48.3550499002 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.197005988 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 12.5979740519 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.32208582834 92% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 98.500998004 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.1389221557 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 540 350
No. of Characters: 2423 1500
No. of Different Words: 190 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.821 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.487 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.646 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 169 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 135 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 91 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 45 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 30 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 17.54 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.364 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.588 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.066 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 6 5