People should question the rule of authority as opposed to accepting them passively.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the reasons for which the statement may or may not be true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In every country around the globe we see different types of authority. Authority has been considered in sociological terms as indicating the legitimate or socially approved use of power. It is the legitimate power which one person or a group holds and exercises over another. Max Weber defined three basic types of legitimate authority which also correspond to three types of dominance or leadership- traditional authority, legal rational authority, and charismatic authority.
While now-a-days, we can see legal- rational and autocratic type of authorities mostly. However, the query arises that whatever type of authority is present, whether the people need to obey it without any question. Because accepting any kind of authority without question gives it the right to continue no matter how it is exercised such as in wrong or right way. As accepting the rules passively can make the government autocratic or lead it to monarchic set of affairs.
Moreover, the rulers being questioned time to time have the fear of people and they don’t try to go against whatever is the best for the people. Questions and criticism keep the government on foot and they try to play with safer cards and keep people satisfy and don’t want to be overthrown by the public before the tenure gets over and at the same time wanted to be re-elected in the next elections. The questions also keep the public money safe and government doesn’t spend them on wasteful projects. It also cause lack of corruption and people become more aware that what is good for them and the country.
On the other hand, in communist or Taliban- occupied countries questioning government can be dangerous for the citizens as these governments (authorities) don’t accept the opposition from people or anyone else. This type of autocratic governments can be seen in the countries like North Korea, China, Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan and the like and some of the tyrannical examples of these governments are China’s Tiananmen Square Massacre and Afghanistan’s Kabul or Kandahar massacre by Taliban’s government showing the suppression of opposition by the people.
In addition to it, questioning each and every action of the authorities causes delay and make the government less interested and less self- responsible. Since, they start believing that their every action will be questioned hence making them lethargic and they feel dependent upon people to review every decision taken by them before its implementation. For example, when an employee is questioned again and again by authorities about his actions than he losses interest in his job and become lethargic towards its work and see towards the bosses for the approval on every decision which is taken by him.
Hence, the conclusion arises that both accepting the rules of authority passively and opposing them can be a problem for the people but accepting rules passively always leads to corruption in the countries and in long run eats up the foundation of country causing the loss of independence .In contrast, questioning the authority sometimes brought the much needed revolution in countries, for example, in India which revolted against the oppression of British Empire bringing back the life of Indian public. So, the questioning of authority can also be the key for the political, social and economic change for the betterment of the country.
- Some people believe that competition drives young athletes to perform at their best, while others believe that competition discourages those who are not athletically talented from participating in organized sports. 50
- The city council of Town X has proposed reducing the city’s electric expenses by switching all the lights in public buildings from incandescent bulbs to light-emitting diodes (LEDs). The switch would be made gradually as the old incandescent bulbs burn 55
- In the last year s mayoral election in Town T candidate Miller led candidate Keating by a substantial margin in the polls leading up to the election At the last minute candidate Keating launched a widely viewed series of television advertisements that foc 27
- Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well-being of the societies and environments in which they operate.Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations, provided they operate within the law, is to make as 79
- In a laboratory study of two different industrial cleansers, CleanAll was found to remove 40% more dirt and kill 30% more bacteria than the next best cleanser. Furthermore, a study showed that employees working at buildings cleaned with cleanAll used far 49
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 527, Rule ID: IT_VBZ
Message: Did you mean 'causes'?
...pend them on wasteful projects. It also cause lack of corruption and people become mo...
Line 6, column 345, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE
Message: Simply use 'some'.
...ran, Iraq, Afghanistan and the like and some of the tyrannical examples of these government...
Line 10, column 289, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
...country causing the loss of independence .In contrast, questioning the authority s...
Line 10, column 291, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
...untry causing the loss of independence .In contrast, questioning the authority som...
Line 10, column 401, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...ed revolution in countries, for example, in India which revolted against the oppr...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, while, for example, in addition, in contrast, kind of, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 34.0 14.8657303371 229% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2868.0 2235.4752809 128% => OK
No of words: 546.0 442.535393258 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25274725275 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83390555256 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91998146895 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 276.0 215.323595506 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505494505495 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 907.2 704.065955056 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 104.99439373 60.3974514979 174% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.947368421 118.986275619 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7368421053 23.4991977007 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63157894737 5.21951772744 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174566297033 0.243740707755 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577359371296 0.0831039109588 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0364718470211 0.0758088955206 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0929269833102 0.150359130593 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044209499223 0.0667264976115 66% => OK
automated_readability_index: 17.7 14.1392134831 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 48.8420337079 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 100.480337079 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.