Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for th

Essay topics:

Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

Judgment of work in any fields is valued in many aspects. Some say that it is only valuable when it comes from an expert in the field, While others hold the opposite opinion that even the judgment from an layman may sometimes be practical. Admittedly, judgment from expert is more accurate and persuasive in general because it is based on researches and evidences. However, I still strongly believe that it is important to incorporate all kinds of judgment. In the following paragraphs, I will illustrate the idea from three views of point.

To begin with, judgment from expert is much more reliable. Their judgment of work is based on continuous researches and experiences, while others make judgement merely by conjecture without solid evidences. As a result, expert’s judgment is more likely to predict something accurately and value something correctly. Take meteorology for example. It is better for people to believe the professional report from a weather forecaster instead of accepting the conjecture about weather from others. Though people in my country suffer from numerous typhoons during summer season, we are not hurt seriously because the forecast always predict typhoon accurately. We know when should we stay in home instead of going outside. Therefore, the judgment of expert prevent negative consequences from happening effectively.

Nevertheless, expert may sometimes be refrained by their own experience and thus unable to think outside the box. However, it is those so-called layman sometimes think imaginatively and come up with practical ideas. For instance, a type of computer made by a company was reported to have serious problem that the computer was not able to run some applications. The company hired a experienced programmer to fix the problem, but he could not solve it. Instead, the problem was solved by an operator who accidentally found that the chips was dirty in those computers. The problem was resulted from hardware instead of software that it was meaningless for a programmer to identify the problem. Therefore, sometimes we should adopt various kind of opinions.

Third,in some fields of study, anyone can make critical judgment of work because the work can be appreciated in many aspects. It is especially true in the fields of art because there is not an universally objective criteria to measure any pieces of artwork. For example, Chang’s abstract paintings were not valued by those so-called experts decades ago in my country because they did not understand the meaning behind the artworks. However, those works are highly appreciated by publics as it expressed the ordinary lifestyle similar to them. Though his works were criticized by experts, he was still regarded as one of the most great artists in my country. Thus, there is no uniform standard to measure works in some fields.

In sum, though expert’s judgment of works may be persuasive in general, we should not preclude all the opinions which are not proposed by experts. After all, experts’ idea may sometimes go wrong and those layman’s points may be penetrative due to their unlimited thinking.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 203, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ite opinion that even the judgment from an layman may sometimes be practical. Admi...
^^
Line 5, column 65, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...from expert is much more reliable. Their judgment of work is based on continuous...
^^
Line 5, column 95, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ble. Their judgment of work is based on continuous researches and experiences, w...
^^
Line 9, column 380, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...un some applications. The company hired a experienced programmer to fix the probl...
^
Line 9, column 702, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mmer to identify the problem. Therefore, sometimes we should adopt various kind o...
^^
Line 13, column 6, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...opt various kind of opinions. Third,in some fields of study, anyone can make c...
^^^
Line 13, column 191, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... the fields of art because there is not an universally objective criteria to measu...
^^
Line 17, column 289, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rative due to their unlimited thinking.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, third, thus, while, after all, for example, for instance, in general, kind of, as a result, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2654.0 2235.4752809 119% => OK
No of words: 502.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28685258964 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7334296765 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89653284829 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 215.323595506 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519920318725 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 837.0 704.065955056 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.904687126 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7857142857 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9285714286 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 5.21951772744 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213555515195 0.243740707755 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592581058046 0.0831039109588 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053934908306 0.0758088955206 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121153939088 0.150359130593 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568710807302 0.0667264976115 85% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 100.480337079 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.