Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Everyone in an organisation would be torrid to contribute to solving problems and receive accolades from the colleagues as well as higher managment. However, not all the opinions are considered equally and some have an upper hand in deciding the future course of action. The prompt suggests that critical judgement from dabbler is accorded less importance than from a savant in the field. I agree with the prompt and feel that an expert in the field is valued more than a novice when it comes to critical judgement for the following reasons.
Firstly, an expert in a field will have a subtantial amount of track record that can be placed under the lens of scrutiny in order to determine if his critical judgement is sound enough and is free from fallacies. The opinion of the people about once past successes and failures plays as important role in how they receive critical judgement from someone. Since, people already know how a person has faired in the past and given an expert displayed sound critical judgement, they are more likely to consider the expert's opinions reliable. In contrast, if a critical assessment is given by a nondesript who is just getting started in his career, since people are not aware of the person's intellectual capabilities or the person does not have a proven track record, the folks around would demur to consider his judgement. They would instead view such assessment with cynicism. Thus, the preconceived idealogy that people have regarding experts would preclude them to accept critical analysis by an amatuer.
Secondly, people learn more from their professional careers than they do in their college education. And this learning happens passively, that is, they learn from their dialy experiences as time progresses. Since, an expert in a field is in the business for quite some time as compared to a dillatante, the expert is sure to have experienced enough of multifarious scenarios while solving problems. These experiences will make the critical judgement from the expert to consider multiple scenarios that definetely cannot be taught in a conventional college education curriculum. Having equipped with invaluable experience, an expert is definetely more qualified than a beginner and thus, his critical judgement is given more importance.
However, in the realms of discussion, we cannot ignore a few exceptoins. There are certain fields, especially in the field of Software Development, where we see amatuers making big impact in the world. One such example is Facebook. It was developed by a college dropout who barely scratched the surface of corporate world. Thus, in some fields, critical judgement of novices should be given more important where the opinions of experts look obsolete.
To recapitulate, an expert should be given more importance with regard to critical judgement as he possesses a proven track record as well as invaluable experience. However, in fields like Software Development, Technology, etc
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-16 | Jeyodi123 | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | Anil2044 | 50 | view |
| 2023-04-16 | AtharvaKale | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-21 | HSNDEK | 83 | view |
| 2022-08-07 | avidwriter1771 | 50 | view |
- The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your 58
- People s behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting 58
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be su 58
- Grades encourage students to work harder at school Do you agree or disagree Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 68
- Archaeologists have long thought that an artifact called the pemchint was used by Dodecan people solely as a musical instrument Pemchints consist of hollowed pieces of bone shell or wood that are tied together with long straps When whirled in the air the 79
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, look, regarding, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, in contrast, such as, as well as, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2499.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 478.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2280334728 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67581127817 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8302408556 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483263598326 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 794.7 704.065955056 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6528681699 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.590909091 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7272727273 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36363636364 5.21951772744 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197347003257 0.243740707755 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0644540343228 0.0831039109588 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469540538666 0.0758088955206 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126701074918 0.150359130593 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0332884673381 0.0667264976115 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 100.480337079 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.