Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the

Essay topics:

Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

Whether the judgement is useful from someone who is not an expert in that field can be evaluate from many aspects. However, the layman sometimes can point to the blind area where the experts can hardly notice.

Those who argue my stand contend that only the experts know enough knowledge and can make practical suggestion, however, those who dive into the field can ignore the secular side of the field. For example, when considering education system change and revitalization, experts like professors may demand teachers in the senior and junior high schools to design more interesting experiments and eliminate the dogmatic teaching in order to encourage students’ motivation, but without rudimentary information, students cannot understand what the purposes about the experiments, not to mention those students who do not like science, those extra experiments will push them away even farer.

Moreover, experts sometimes can use the most orthodox way to solve problems while normal people can think of a more easy and strait solution. Take Covid-19’s prevention for example. Experts and governments encourage people to wear masks and offer a series of relating advice to eliminate the serious of the pandemic. Nevertheless, the most effective way is to stay at home that most people without a specific medication license can realize. Most of us are not experts, but if we judge the governments to hold giant celebration and encourage people to go out with masks instead of make people stay at home, this has a big value and very sensible.

Acerbic judgement only from the field can tarnish the field since only the people in that region can connect to the work and lead to less improvements. Take clothing design for instance. Those high fashion and fast fashion are from specific artists and offered to customers who are not experts on art. If only the art designers can judge the products like new boots and high-tech shirts, those works can be very delicate but not convenient for usual wear. Soon, the brand will be closed because only the experts in the region admire it and the target buyers are driven away by the useless products with pioneering outlook. None-experts are the art products’ main supporters, to ignore their judgement make no sense at all.

In sum, critical judgement from other fields of people is helpful at many sides because the clearer view and can think outside the box. Treating the advice from none-experts is fruitless can cause the field’s demise as the example above.

Average: 8.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:


Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Whether the judgement is useful from someone wh...
Line 7, column 134, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun improvements is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ion can connect to the work and lead to less improvements. Take clothing design for ...

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, while, for example, for instance

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2113.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 414.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1038647343 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64277811765 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54347826087 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 652.5 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 96.6126643894 60.3974514979 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.294117647 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3529411765 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23529411765 5.21951772744 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149712289272 0.243740707755 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0573566919603 0.0831039109588 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484512479462 0.0758088955206 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0992711611784 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363197266134 0.0667264976115 54% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?


Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.