Dinosaurs as Endotherm Animals
The lecture opposed the reading that advocates dinosaurs were endotherms with three reasons.
Firstly, the reading mentioned the dinosaurs were exposed at polar areas. However, the lecture pointed out that the Polar Regions were warm enough then when dinosaurs lived there, and they could migrate to warmer places as the winter came. The region where the dinosaurs been discovered cannot prove that dinosaurs are endotherms.
The second conflict between the lecture and reading is that the latter claimed dinosaurs' body were as like as crocodiles need high energy to support. On the other hand, the lecture proposed an explanation that the dinosaurs' leg might used to hold heavy weight and help them to grow higher except for run faster.
Lastly, the reading denoted the dinosaurs' bone structure were similar to endotherms. Albeit the structures were alike, the lecture cast doubt on it for dinosaurs had growth rings to stop growing or slower growing during tough times and seasons which forms a huge difference with endotherms who grow quickly and unable to stop.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 248, Rule ID: HEAVY_WEIGHT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'heavyweight'?
Suggestion: heavyweight
...at the dinosaurs leg might used to hold heavy weight and help them to grow higher except for...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, lastly, second, so, then, except for, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 22.412803532 36% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 30.3222958057 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 1373.03311258 66% => OK
No of words: 172.0 270.72406181 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 4.04702891845 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34199873729 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 145.348785872 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.639534883721 0.540411800872 118% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 419.366225166 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9083423507 49.2860985944 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.875 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06452816374 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250259873684 0.272083759551 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126014337148 0.0996497079465 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600172785078 0.0662205650399 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167949077266 0.162205337803 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493386636024 0.0443174109184 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.3589403974 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 63.6247240618 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.