Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Knowing numerous subjects in shallow ways or major in a single subject in a deeper way has been a convincing topic. I support people to excavate a single or few academic subjects rather than know a lot but not deep. Specialize in one subject is more difficult and its payback is more worthwhile. Experts in one area cannot be swapped into people who know many subjects broadly while not profession. What's worse, in academic fields, know very shallow means no nothing at times.
It is tougher to dig into a specific academic subject than to learn pieces of knowledge from many subjects. In most universities, students are required to take courses including broad academic subjects. As I know, these courses are usually reach to the introduction level and seldom make real profits to students.However, students' formal majors are more important and relating to their future path closely.
Mastering on one subject can bring people job. For example, a person who major in machine learning can have the profession that cannot be replaced by other people who did not spend enough time on it. A person knows many subjects cannot go deeper without efforts especially on academic aspects.
Having wide range of many academic subjects sometimes equals to know nothing since simple understanding cannot produce any contribution to the field. Take painting for example. Normal people can distinguish the different types of paintings and artistic works while only the profession person can make those ideas into reality.
Major in one subject is outweigh to know a lot of academic subjects. Those working and preparing time is hard to be copied. Specialize in one subject can make actual benefits while broad but shallow knowledge is less profitable. The importance of major in a specific area of academic subject cannot be emphasized more.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-18 | Joanne Chang | 67 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- 30 The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of Quiot Manufacturing During the past year Quiot Manufacturing had 30 percent more on the job accidents than at the nearby Panoply Industries plant where the work shifts are one hour shorter than 68
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information Others think access to much information creates problems Which view do you agree with Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Dinosaurs as Endotherm Animals 76
- In many organizations perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages First of all a group of people has a wider range of knowledge exper 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 400, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
... subjects broadly while not profession. Whats worse, in academic fields, know very sh...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 241, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'reached'.
Suggestion: reached
...s. As I know, these courses are usually reach to the introduction level and seldom ma...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 314, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...nd seldom make real profits to students.However, students formal majors are more import...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 25, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'outweighed'.
Suggestion: outweighed
...to reality. Major in one subject is outweigh to know a lot of academic subjects. Tho...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13333333333 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71420952274 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546666666667 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.5772373621 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.5555555556 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.22222222222 7.06120827912 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261344472826 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0974883494793 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744933825762 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157430109377 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605959228054 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.