Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The extended family (grandparents, cousins, aunts, and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
As the types of family nowadays had been changed into a smaller scale, some people believe the extended family is not as important as before. I strongly agree with that opinion. Most people do not live with many extended family nowadays which makes their advice less accountable. Relationships can be decrease as the physical distance between family members. Extended family can be replaced by friends since the Internet is so improving that it is easy to chat with people who share the same hobbies with us and rely on their thoughts.
The extended family seldom live with most of us now, which lead their suggestions impact us merely than the past. For example, which school should a child enter is a vital issue for many families, in the past, extended family like older cousins and uncles can offer their experiences. However, extended family no longer live with us, we tend to ask our neighbors or closer friends.
Because extended family is not living with people usually unlike the old days.
Strong links between family members is hard to build than the past. It is quiet understandable since we can hardly see our extended family face to face if we do not live in the nearby areas. The relationships are weaker than the past when many family members including extended family lived together and gather a small valley.
The Internet enhance the people who share the same values meet each other. It is undeniable that sometimes we hold a better relationship with our friends than the extended family. The advance of technology brings social networks and social media which create many relation webs like soccer clubs or online chatting rooms only for specific groups and so on. For instance, we are highly possible to ask our friends on snack lover club about what kind of cookie is tasty rather than ask an extended family who does not have any interest in snacks.
Families now are live together in a smaller size than the past and which extended family is excluded can hardly provide practical advice on many aspects. The physical length between people and their extended families can also lengthen the spiritual distances. We can count on online friends instead of extended family in the modern world. The extended family is less important now than the past is unavoidable.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer67
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is important to know about events happening around the world even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer70
- Every year forest fires and severe storms cause a great deal of damage to forests in the northwestern United States One way of dealing with aftermath of these disasters is called salvage logging which is the practice of removing dead trees from affected a76
- Private collectors have been selling and buying fossils the petrified remains of ancient organisms ever since the eighteenth century In recent years however the sale of fossils particularly of dinosaurs and other large vertebrates has grown into a big bus76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ask our neighbors or closer friends. Because extended family is not living with peop...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, then, for example, for instance, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1918.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 388.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94329896907 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38771655555 2.67179642975 89% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502577319588 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 601.2 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0416460192 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.15 5.45110844103 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254314185051 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103310752021 0.076458572812 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703517237087 0.0737576698707 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15293693442 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487689658037 0.0645574589148 76% => OK
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.