Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
An impactful critical judgement in any field requires a sharp analysis and background knowledge. Without knowledge, most of the judgement are kind of futile. Therefore, I mostly agree with the claim that critical judgment without an expert of any given field produces a trivial effect for following two reasons.
Firstly, producing judgements and analysis without significant knowledge in one field are not only produces a little value but also they are mostly harmful. For instance, some drug like hydroquinone is considered and used as a the cosmetics ingredient by beauty industry that reduces the blemish and make a person fair But they are not aware of the other issues can be produced by hydroquinone like in usage for longer period it can even cause skin cancer. But the drug analysist or chemist actually knew the effect of product. So often a little knowledge can lead to result that can seems like effective to some extent but a critical judgement which actually meticulously produces all the effects of the result can be done by a skillful person.
Secondly, an expert's analysis are deeper, pedantic and broader as well as highly effective. For example, Alberts Einstein's theory of relativity is much effectual and that can not be even imagined by a non-expert person. Therefore, if we look at all innovations of todays world, we can see that all the innovations are done by the scientists are recognized after a life long research on specific field. Therefore, just throwing one comment or analysis without knowing the issue can not persuade others to believe the judgment. Besides, if a person who is engineer in profession but works as a lawyer for one court, can he or she express a good judgement over the case? The answer is absolutely no. Therefore knowledge on that fields makes a person more skillful to judge the matter more critically.
However, It may be true that in some cases people just ignore analysis of a outside person of that field. For example, if a historians can give a nice review and judgement on analysis of the society according to his knowledge from his field. In that cases, when the fields are kind of related, some knowledges are often useful to produce a impact judgment on some issue.
So to conclude, critical judgment can be produced from a person who has enough background knowledge to judge the issue properly and little knowledge often bring less impactful works.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 226, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'a' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: a; the
... hydroquinone is considered and used as a the cosmetics ingredient by beauty industry...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 14, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'experts'' or 'expert's'?
Suggestion: experts'; expert's
...e by a skillful person. Secondly, an experts analysis are deeper, pedantic and broad...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 64, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...alysis are deeper, pedantic and broader as well as highly effective. For example, ...
^^
Line 6, column 698, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... the case? The answer is absolutely no. Therefore knowledge on that fields makes a person...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 75, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...me cases people just ignore analysis of a outside person of that field. For examp...
^
Line 8, column 123, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a historian' or simply 'historians'?
Suggestion: a historian; historians
...e person of that field. For example, if a historians can give a nice review and judgement on...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 339, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... knowledges are often useful to produce a impact judgment on some issue. So to...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, kind of, as well as, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2021.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 407.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9656019656 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70020657572 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498771498771 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 657.0 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.4629260961 60.3974514979 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.277777778 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6111111111 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.44444444444 5.21951772744 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166503902163 0.243740707755 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057651333971 0.0831039109588 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602301282208 0.0758088955206 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109442341407 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0570528777674 0.0667264976115 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.