Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs.
Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree or disagree. Be certain to fully develop your position and carefully consider ways in which your position could be challenged.
This topic raises the arguable issue of whether discussing controversial topics with seemingly cantrasting minded people is wasting of time or not. Indisputably, when contrasted minded people sit together to discuss something, it often leads the discussion into an argument which was not intended. Nevertheless, argument over an controversial topic can really useful in revealing the pro & cons of both sides of the controversy. Thus, I generally disagree with the claim that discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful and would argue against it.
First of all, discussing doesn't mean that every participating person have to agree on a similar issue. I would like to point out that if a discussion is about a controversial topic, then it is obvious that there will people who doesn't agree to each other on that topic. To illustrate, let us look at the example of finding out the best footballer of current time. In this circumstance, obviously there will be people arguing about different players to be the best. Consequently, it is pretty obvious that the discussion will produce many different perspective of a player's quality.
Furthermore, discussing a controversial topic with similar minded people can certainly lead to biased output of a discussion. Specifically, that discussion will merely provide any brainstorming or arguement. Hence, all the evidence shows that discussion of controversial topic must include people who have contrasting views.
Admittedly, a discussion of contrasted people may lead to quarrel or anrchy. This is specially true when they are dicussing about political issues. In addition, sometimes they even stop the discussion the middle of a argument. However, I still don't support idea of not making contrasted people sit together to discuss a controversial topic. Because, it will generate more goodsthan it will generate any bad.
In conclusion, although there are slight problems associated with it, discussing controversial topics with contrasting will produce productive discussion. As long as there are some measurements to be performed and some areas to be included, this will hold true for the controversial topics.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 327, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...t intended. Nevertheless, argument over an controversial topic can really useful i...
^^
Line 5, column 26, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ainst it. First of all, discussing doesnt mean that every participating person ha...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 229, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...t is obvious that there will people who doesnt agree to each other on that topic. To i...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 535, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...bvious that the discussion will produce many different perspective of a players quality. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 114, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...can certainly lead to biased output of a discussion. Specifically, that discussio...
^^
Line 13, column 216, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... even stop the discussion the middle of a argument. However, I still dont support...
^
Line 13, column 245, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... middle of a argument. However, I still dont support idea of not making contrasted p...
^^^^
Line 13, column 342, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ether to discuss a controversial topic. Because, it will generate more goodsthan it wil...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, really, so, still, then, thus, as to, in addition, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1876.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 340.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51764705882 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16653627053 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535294117647 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.7075383023 60.3974514979 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.7368421053 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8947368421 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26315789474 5.21951772744 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357767806687 0.243740707755 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118450800117 0.0831039109588 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0807270578955 0.0758088955206 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214699209006 0.150359130593 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0748292789353 0.0667264976115 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.44 12.1639044944 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.