Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs.
Whenever you questioned someone's beliefs, you normally have to face criticism. I agree It's peculiarly normal in our society. Your fundamental education is always being questioned when you enter to the Litmus society. For example, if you talk about the traditional practices which in practice by some family or community in your society, it will amaze you with their fundamental beliefs and their trust in their religion or their culture. And being questioned about their belief and the peculiarity of their culture and religion can make this controversial and more precisely can hurt their sentiments.
There are several practices happens under every religion or culture, which sounds very odd and sometimes very unnecessary. If you see some religions perform several kinds of practices, for example, the self-hurt happens in Muslim Shia culture. They basically hurt themselves for a month just to simulate the situation occur to their ancestors or the condition they were in during their end time. It's very inappropriate to practice these kinds of practices on yourself, because as far as I know no religion tells you to hurt your body or disproportionate your physical self for your ancestors. And the most interesting thing is the upcoming educated youth of this religion is quite familiar with these kinds of abnormalities. But they still silent on these topics. That just not bad for yourself, it's also very wrong with the education you adopted.
And this thing becomes a very normal practice in their religion, even questioned by their fellow scholars, they don't want to rethink the situation. No one has ever being successful to change their minds because it is their own core beliefs.
In India, the country which is known for the biggest democratic country and for the unity of mixed religions in the country often comes into the state of controversies of traditional practices by different religions. And I feel it all because of the illiteracy in that country. I believe due to more than half of the country is below the literacy rate causes these consequences. Because you won't see this kind of behavior in the society of literate people. Also because education gives us the freedom to think and a field of understanding the unfamiliar cultures or practices.
In Conclusion, I want to say being literate can solve these controversies happening due to the question on your core beliefs. And the day will come when people will think or work on it openly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 113, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...estioned by their fellow scholars, they dont want to rethink the situation. No one h...
^^^^
Line 13, column 380, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...iteracy rate causes these consequences. Because you wont see this kind of behavior in t...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 458, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...vior in the society of literate people. Also because education gives us the freedom ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, for example, i feel, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 60.0 33.0505617978 182% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2077.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 408.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09068627451 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81216971233 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 215.323595506 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 650.7 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.82614536 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.9047619048 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4285714286 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267121808567 0.243740707755 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0776608915458 0.0831039109588 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0780047758519 0.0758088955206 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163321091237 0.150359130593 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0912564594124 0.0667264976115 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.