Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs.
It is not useful to discuss controversial topics with people of contrasting views as very few change their mind when questioned about their beliefs. Personally I believe that it is not useful to discuss controversial topics with these kind of people. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, people are raised or brought up with certain principles or beliefs that shape their character. These beliefs act as their character's foundational building block so changing their mindset when questioning about their core beliefs would be difficult or close to impossible. This is because they would do everything in their power to justify as to why their beliefs still hold good so to not have an identity crisis. For instance, we can see that people belonging to early 1900's have the view that woman are only meant for household work but when asked to change their perception about this view, they would be stubborn and adamant on not changing the view.
Secondly, people don't tend change their mindset on certain beliefs which was constructed by traumatic experiences. This is because every-time they talk about these beliefs, respective traumatic experience plays in their mind not allowing them to have an optimistic or an open mind towards a discussion. For instance, a terrorist attack in USA made Americans to have the perception that all muslims are terrorists.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that controversial topics shouldn't be discussed with people of contrasting views.This is because people don't tend to change their ideas or beliefs with which they brought up with as it is an integral part of their character, and because beliefs linked with traumatic experiences are hard to change.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 91, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun change seems to be countable; consider using: 'few changes'.
Suggestion: few changes
...ith people of contrasting views as very few change their mind when questioned about their ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 230, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...ul to discuss controversial topics with these kind of people. I feel this way for two reas...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 18, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...hanging the view. Secondly, people dont tend change their mindset on certain be...
^^^^
Line 13, column 62, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...f the opinion that controversial topics shouldnt be discussed with people of contrasting...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 117, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...cussed with people of contrasting views.This is because people dont tend to change t...
^^^^
Line 13, column 140, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ontrasting views.This is because people dont tend to change their ideas or beliefs w...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, so, still, as to, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1475.0 2235.4752809 66% => OK
No of words: 289.0 442.535393258 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10380622837 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75875563074 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 215.323595506 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515570934256 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 704.065955056 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.0007566017 60.3974514979 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.090909091 118.986275619 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2727272727 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.21951772744 192% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 10.2758426966 19% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.547288983183 0.243740707755 225% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.223902800139 0.0831039109588 269% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.229082367553 0.0758088955206 302% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.366857190135 0.150359130593 244% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.162330252371 0.0667264976115 243% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 100.480337079 57% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.